Streetspace, Inc v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 33

RESPONSE in Opposition re 23 Joint MOTION for Change Venue filed by Streetspace, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of James V. Fazio, III in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Transfer Venue, # 2 Exhibts A-M, # 3 Exhibits N-W)(Fazio, James) (kaj).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DOUGLAS E. OLSON (CSB NO. 38649) dougolson@sandiegoiplaw.com JAMES V. FAZIO, III (CSB NO. 183353) jamesfazio@sandiegoiplaw.com TREVOR Q. CODDINGTON, PH.D. (CSB NO. 243042) trevorcoddington@sandiegoiplaw.com SAN DIEGO IP LAW GROUP LLP 12526 High Bluff Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Telephone: (858) 792-3446 Facsimile: (858) 792-3447 Attorneys for Plaintiff STREETSPACE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 STREETSPACE, INC., a Delaware corporation, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DECLARATION OF JAMES V. FAZIO, III IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE Plaintiff, 13 14 CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB vs. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation; ADMOB, INC., a Delaware corporation; APPLE INC., a California corporation; QUATTRO WIRELESS, INC., a Delaware corporation; NOKIA CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; NOKIA INC., a Delaware corporation; NAVTEQ CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; MILLENNIAL MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation; JUMPTAP, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Date: Time: Judge: Ctrm: March 14, 2011 11:15 a.m. Hon. Larry A. Burns 9 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 FAZIO DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB 1 I, James V. Fazio, III, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner with San Diego IP Law Group LLP, counsel of record for plaintiff 3 Streetspace, Inc. in the above-captioned matter. I have personal knowledge of the following facts 4 and, if called upon to do so, I could and would testify competently thereto. 5 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Defendants’ Joint 6 Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to the U.S. District Court for the 7 Southern District of California filed in SPH America, LLC v. Acer, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:09-cv- 8 740-LMB (E.D. Va.) obtained from the Public Access to Court Electronic Records at 9 www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov. 10 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Declaration of Jari 11 Niemela, Vice President of AT&T Product Development Line of Nokia Inc., in Support of 12 Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) by Defendant Nokia Inc. filed in SPH 13 America, LLC v. Apple, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:09-cv-776-LMB (E.D. Va.) obtained from the 14 Public Access to Court Electronic Records at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov. 15 16 17 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a May 28, 2009 article appearing in xconomy, San Diego. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a printout of all federal 18 cases to which Google, Inc. is a party, which was obtained from the Public Access to Court 19 Electronic Records database at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov and inputting “Google” as the search 20 term in the “Party Name” field and “All Courts” in the “Region” field, and counting all non- 21 closed cases. 22 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of a printout of all patent 23 cases to which Google, Inc. is a party, which was obtained from the Public Access to Court 24 Electronic Records database at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov and inputting “Google” as the search 25 term in the “Party Name” field, “All Courts” in the “Region” field, and “830” in the “Nature of 26 Suit” field, and counting all non-closed cases. 27 28 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of a printout of all federal cases to which Apple, Inc. is a party, which was obtained from the Public Access to Court -1FAZIO DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB 1 Electronic Records database at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov and inputting “Apple, Inc.” as the 2 search term in the “Party Name” field and “All Courts” in the “Region” field, and counting all 3 non-closed cases. 4 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of a printout of all patent 5 cases to which Apple, Inc. is a party, which was obtained from the Public Access to Court 6 Electronic Records database at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov and inputting “Apple, Inc.” as the 7 search term in the “Party Name” field, “All Courts” in the “Region” field, and “830” in the 8 “Nature of Suit” field, and counting all non-closed cases. 9. 9 Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct listing of the Apple stores 10 located in San Diego, California using the Apple Retail Store locator on Apple’s website at 11 www.apple.com/retail/locator.index/html. 10. 12 Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Google’s Phone Gallery 13 available on its website located at www.google.com/phone, which lists AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, 14 and Verizon among “All Operators.” 11. 15 Attached collectively hereto as Exhibit J are true and correct listings of all stores 16 located in San Diego, California operated by AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, and Verizon, which were 17 obtained using the Store Locator from their respective websites located at 18 www.att.com/storelocator.com, http://sprintstorelocator.com, http://locator.t-mobile.com/Locator, 19 and http://www.verizonwireless.com. 12. 20 Attached hereto as Exhibit K are true and correct printouts from Google’s website 21 located at www.google.com/intl/kn/jobs/locations/, indicating that Google has two offices in 22 Santa Monica and Irvine, California. 13. 23 Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct excerpt from Nokia 24 Corporation’s Form 20-F filing with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission on March 12, 25 2010. 14. 26 Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct listing of Millennial Media’s 27 offices obtained from its website at http://www.millennialmedia.com/about-millennialmedia/fact- 28 sheet/. -2FAZIO DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB 15. 1 Attached collectively hereto as Exhibit N are true and correct copies of two press 2 releases issued by Millennial Media on April 16, 2009 and June 18, 2009, which are available in 3 its Press Room located on its website at http://www.millennialmedia.com. 16. 4 Attached collectively hereto as Exhibit O are true and correct copies of a 5 December 15, 2008 Jumptap press release and a listing of Jumptap’s Mobile Operators obtained 6 from its website at http://www.jumptap.com/partners. 17. 7 8 Calendar available on its website at http://www.jumptap.com/events. 18. 9 10 Attached hereto as Exhibit P are true and correct excerpts from Jumptap’s Events Attached hereto as Exhibit Q is a true and correct excerpt from Google, Inc.’s 2009 Annual Report available on its website at www.google.com. 19. 11 Attached hereto as Exhibit R is a true and correct excerpt from Apple, Inc.’s Form 12 10-K/A filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended 13 September 26, 2009. 20. 14 15 Attached hereto as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of a January 5, 2011 press release from Millennial Media. 21. 16 Attached hereto as Exhibit T is a true and correct copy of a September 27, 2010 17 article in Business Insider reporting on a telephone conversation with George Bell, Jumptap’s 18 CEO. 19 22. Attached hereto as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of Table C-5 of the federal 20 judicial caseload statistics published by the Administrative Office of U.S. Courts for the 12- 21 month period ended March 31, 2010, available at 22 http://www.uscourts.gov/Viewer.aspx?doc=/uscourts/Statistics/FederalJudicialCaseloadStatistics/ 23 2010/tables/C01Mar10.pdf. 24 23. Attached hereto as Exhibit V is a true and correct copy of a printout of all federal 25 cases to which Nokia Corporation is a party, which was obtained from the Public Access to Court 26 Electronic Records database at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov and inputting “Nokia Corporation” 27 as the search term in the “Party Name” field and “All Courts” in the “Region” field, and counting 28 only non-closed cases. -3FAZIO DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB 1 24. Attached hereto as Exhibit W is a true and correct copy of a printout of all federal 2 cases to which Nokia Inc. is a party, which was obtained from the Public Access to Court 3 Electronic Records database at www.pacer.psc.uscourts.gov and inputting “Nokia Inc.” as the 4 search term in the “Party Name” field and “All Courts” in the “Region” field, and counting only 5 non-closed cases. 6 7 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 28th day of February, 2011 at San Diego, California. 8 9 10 By:/s./James V. Fazio, III JAMES V. FAZIO, III 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4FAZIO DECL. IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE NO. 10-CV-1757-LAB-AJB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?