Streetspace, Inc v. Google, Inc. et al
PRO HAC VICE APPOINTED: Timothy J. Rousseau appearing for Defendant Jumptap, Inc. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
UNITED STA TES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CLERK. U,S. DISTRICT COURT
PRO HAC VICE APPLICA nON
I, T!mothy J. Rou~seau
to appear and participate in this case and in support of petition state:
My firm name:
City, State, ZIP:
hereby petition the above entitled court to permit me
¢;oodwin Procter, LLP
~20 Eighth A venue
few York, NY 10018
I was admitted to practice before the Courts of the State of New York
That on 3/10/2009:
(Name of Court)
and am currently in good standing and eligible to practice in said court,
that I am not curren,ly suspended or disbarred in any other court, and
that I 0 (have)
(have not) concurrently or within the year preceding this application made any pro hac
vice application to this court~
(If previous application made, complete the following)
Title of case _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Case number _ _ _ _ _ _- - - - - - - - - Date of application _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
I declare under pena'ty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
, - - ',',
Timothy J. Rousseau
DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL
I hereby designate t~e below named as associate local counsel.
Kurt M. Kjelland
Goodwin Procter LLP
4365 Executive Drive
San Diego, CA
Case No. 3:1O-CV-1757-LAB-AJB
GOOGLE INC., ADMOB~ INC., APPLE
INC., QUATIRO WlRELiESS, INC.,
NOKIA CORPORATIONi NOKIA INC.,
NAVTEQ CORPORATION, MILLENIAL
MEDIA, INC., JUMPTAP:, INC., and
DOES 1 though 20, inclusive,
American LegalNet. Inc.
I hereby consent to the abo V\! designation.
The pro hac vice application
is hereby approved for filing
W. Samuel Hamrick, Jr.
Clerk of Court
MAR 0 2 2011 i
SOUTHf:HI\lulSTRlCT 0,-' G;\ !FOr:lNIA
By Deputy Clerk
Received $180.00 for Court LJbrary fee
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ jDeputy Clerk
Pro Hac Vice
(For this ojue particular occasion)
An attorney ~ho is not a mtmber of the California State Bar, but who is a member in good standing of, and eligible to
proactive befare, the bar of [any United States Court or of the highest court of any State or of any Territory or Insular
possession of ithe United St~tes, who is of good moral character, and who has been retained to appear in this Court, be
permitted to appear and partIcipate in a particular case. An attorney is not eligible to practice pursuant to this paragraph
in anyone or more of the fdllowing apply to him/her: (I) he/she resides in California, (2) he/she is regularly employed
in California, ,or (3) he/she is regularly engaged in business, professional, 01' other activities in California.
The pro hac vice applicatio~ shall be presented to the Clerk and shall state under penalty of perjury (I) the attorney's
residence and office addressj (2) by what court he/she has been admitted to practice and the date of admission, (3) that
he/she is in good standing apd eligible to practice in said court, (4) the he/she is not currently suspended or disbarred
in any other court, and (5) if he/she has concurrently or within the year preceding his/her current application made any
pro hac vice application to tl\.is court, the title and the case number of each matter wherein he made application, the date
of application , and whethe~ or not his/her application was granted. HelShe shall also designate in his application a
member of the bar of this qourt with whom the Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the
conduct of the case and uponl whom papers shall be served. HelShe shall file with such application the address, telephone
number, and written consent pf such designee.
$180.00, payable to /2lerk, U.S. District Court
Application and fee should bll mailed directly to:
W. Samuel Hamrick,ilr., Clerk
United States Djstric~ Court
Southern District of q:alifornia
880 Front Street Suitt 4290
San 9iegO, Californi, 92101-8900
American legalNet, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?