Streetspace, Inc v. Google, Inc. et al
Filing
37
PRO HAC VICE APPOINTED: Douglas J. Kline appearing for Defendant Jumptap, Inc (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STREETSPACE, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff
vs.
GOOGLE INC., ADMO~, INC., APPLE
INC., QUATTRO WIRELESS, INC.,
NOKIA CORPORATION, NOKIA INC.,
NAVTEQ CORPORATI~)N, MILLENIAL
MEDIA, INC., JUMPTAjP, INC., and
DOES 1 though 20, incluisive,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
I, Douglas J. Klire
i
! (Applicant)
to appear an4 participate in ~is case and in support of petition state:
PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION
JUMPTAP, INC.
Party Represented
herf:by petition the above entitled court to permit me
My firm name: :.Goodwin Procter, LLP
i 53 State Street
Street address:
I~----~~~~-------------------------------------------City, State, ZIP: ! Boston, MA 02109
Phone number: ! 617-570-1 000
1M.t on 12J20/19~0
I was admitted to practice before Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
:
(Da~e)
(Name of Court)
and am currehtly in good stapding and eligible to practice in said court,
,
i
!
that I am not curre~tly suspended or disbarred in any other court, and
0
that I
(have) kEJ (have not) concurrently or within the year preceding this application made any pro hac
vice application to this cou~t.
(If previous application made, complete the following)
Title of case ,_ _ _ _--;-______________________________________
Case number _____--;-._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Date of application __________________
Application
o grante~
o denied
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
Douglas J, Q"Io'' '"'"'___''''
DESIGNA TION OF LOCAL COUNSEL
I hereby designate the below named as associate local counsel.
Kurt M. Kjelland
(Name)
Goodwin Procter LLP
(Firm)
4365 Executive Drive
(Street)
(858) 202-2700
(Telephone)
92121-2125
(Zip code)
American LegalNet, Inc
W'WW,FormsWorli:i
.::,y
"
.
~7
. ·... 1 " ; (.,\L}
::,.. :1\
"~·_~_·
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?