United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Paron Capital Management, LLC et al

Filing 238

ORDER ADDRESSING VARIOUS MATTERS. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/12/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, No. C 11-4577 CW Plaintiff, ORDER ADDRESSING VARIOUS MATTERS 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. JAMES D. CROMBIE, Defendant. ________________________________/ Plaintiff United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission moves for leave to file a motion for summary judgment not exceeding twenty-eight pages. Having considered the papers submitted by Plaintiff, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 231) and further GRANTS Defendant James D. Crombie a corresponding page increase in his opposition and cross-motion, as set forth in the table below. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment for violation of the page limit set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4 is DENIED as moot (Docket No. 235). The Court also GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to file a proposed order (Docket No. 237). The Court STRIKES Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and its supporting material (Docket Nos. 202 through 230) as violating the case management order in this case and VACATES the November 15, 2012 hearing date. The case management order provides that Plaintiff’s opening motion for summary judgment was due on October 11, 2012 and that Defendant would file his opposition to Plaintiff’s motion and his own cross-motion for summary judgment, all contained in a single brief, on November 15, 2012. 2 No. 67. 3 case dispositive motions. 4 statement of undisputed facts (Docket No. 203) is also STRICKEN 5 for violation of Civil Local Rule 56-2(a), which provides that no 6 such statement may be submitted without a Court order to do so. 7 Defendant may re-file his motion for summary judgment in a single 8 brief with his opposition to Plaintiff’s motion, as provided in 9 the scheduling order, and subject to the schedule and page limits 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 1 set forth in the table below, as well as his supporting materials, 11 except that Defendant shall not re-file his separate statement of 12 undisputed facts. See Docket It further set December 20, 2012 as the deadline to hear Id. In addition, Defendant’s separate 13 The Court TAKES UNDER SUBMISSION Defendant’s motions for 14 leave to file counterclaims and third-party complaints on the 15 papers (Docket Nos. 191 and 194). 16 Thursday, October 25, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. is VACATED. 17 Defendant’s motion to appear by telephone at the October 25, 2012 18 and November 15, 2012 hearings is DENIED as moot (Docket No. 233). 19 20 The hearing currently set for Accordingly, The current schedule for dispositive motions and page limits for briefs is CONFIRMED as follows: 21 22 Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, in a brief of twentyeight pages or less, is due October 11, 2012 (already filed as Docket No. 234) Defendant’s opposition to Plaintiff’s motion and his cross-motion for summary judgment, both contained in a single brief of twenty-eight pages or less, is due November 15, 2012 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 Plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion and its opposition to Defendant’s cross-motion, both contained in a single brief of fifteen pages or less, is due November 29, 2012 Defendant’s reply in support of his motion, in a brief of fifteen pages or less, is due December 6, 2012 Joint or separate case management statements are due December 13, 2012 Hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment and further case management conference to be held December 20, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 Dated: 10/12/2012 CLAUDIA WILKEN United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?