United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Paron Capital Management, LLC et al

Filing 70

ORDER Granting 68 Stipulation Extending the Deadline for Defendant Paron Capital Management, LLC to Respond to the Complaint. Admissions due by 2/16/2012. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 1/11/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 J. Noah Hagey, Esq. (SBN: 262331) hagey@braunhagey.com 2 Mark P. Fickes, Esq. (SBN: 178570) fickes@braunhagey.com 3 BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN LLP 220 Sansome Street, 2nd Floor 4 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 599-0210 5 Facsimile: (415) 276-1808 6 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT PARON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES 14 TRADING COMMISSION, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PARON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, and ) JAMES D. CROMBIE, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C 11-04577 CW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT PARON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC’S DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO THE COMPLAINT 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 11-04577 CW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Whereas, the deadline for Defendant Paron Capital Management, LLC (“Paron”) to answer 2 or file a responsive pleading to the complaint in this matter is January 11, 2012; 3 Whereas, Plaintiff U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and Paron are 4 engaged in settlement discussions that may obviate the need to respond to the complaint; 5 Whereas, the CFTC and Paron seek a thirty (30) day extension to further explore 6 settlement; 7 Whereas Paron and proposed third party defendants Peter McConnon and Timothy Lyons 8 are all plaintiffs in an action entitled Paron Capital Management, LLC et al. v. James D. Crombie, 9 Case No. 6380-CVP (Del. Ch. Ct.) (the “Delaware Litigation”); 10 Whereas the parties in the Delaware litigation anticipate the Chancery Court to issue a final 11 judgment after having tried the matter in October 2011; 12 Whereas the parties in the Delaware litigation anticipate the Chancery Court will issue the 13 final judgment on or before January 31, 2012; 14 Whereas Paron and Messrs. McConnon and Lyons believe the final judgment will be res 15 judicata on Defendant James D. Crombie’s (“Crombie”) third party complaint and Crombie’s 16 claims and defenses viz the CFTC complaint; and 17 Whereas at the case management conference held on January 4, 2012, the Court set a 18 deadline of February 16, 2012, for Messrs. McConnon and Lyons to file a motion to dismiss or 19 other responsive pleading to Crombie’s third party complaint. 20 Therefore, the CFTC and Paron stipulate and agree, and ask the Court to order, that the 21 deadline for Paron to respond to the complaint is extended up to and including February 16, 2012. 22 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 23 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 11-04577 CW 1 Dated: January 10, 2012 BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN LLP 2 3 By: 4 /s J. Noah Hagey Attorneys for Defendant Paron Capital Management, LLC 5 6 7 Dated: January 10, 2012 U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION 8 9 By: 10 /s Jonathan P. Robell Attorneys for Plaintiff U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission 11 12 13 Filer’s attestation: Pursuant to General Oder No. 45.X.B, counsel for Paron attests that 14 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jonathan P. Robell, counsel for the CFTC. 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 The Court has considered the stipulation of the CFTC and Paron and finds good cause to 17 order that the deadline for Paron to answer or file a responsive pleading to the complaint is 18 extended up to and including February 16, 2012. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: January 11 2012 __, _______________________________ Claudia Wilken UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 11-04577 CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?