United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Paron Capital Management, LLC et al
Filing
81
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE 77 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 2/16/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES
TRADING COMMISSION,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 11-cv-04577 CW (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STATUS
CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 77
PARON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and
JAMES D. CROMBIE,
Defendants.
16
17
The Court conducted a telephonic discovery status conference on February 15, 2012, to
18
address several discovery disputes raised in the parties’ joint statement, Dkt. No. 77. All parties
19
participated in the conference. Based on the representations made by the parties at the
20
conference, and the parties’ joint statement, the Court orders the following:
21
22
23
1. Crombie’s request to seek discovery from third-parties Nirvana Solutions, Spectrum
Fund Administration, and Connie Lau is granted.
2. Crombie’s request to compel Peter McConnon and Timothy Lyons to respond to the
24
interrogatories and request for admission he served on each of them is denied without prejudice.
25
Crombie may renew his request after District Judge Wilken resolves the issue of whether
26
Crombie’s service of his third-party complaint on McConnon and Lyons was adequate.
27
28
3. Crombie’s request to remove the protective order currently governing Paron’s
document production is denied for lack of good cause shown.
Case No. 11-cv-04577 CW (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
STATUS CONFERENCE
1
4. Crombie’s request to obtain from Paron discovery generated after March 31, 2011, is
2
denied, as Crombie has not established the relevance of the documents requested. The Court
3
may consider particularized requests with respect to discovery generated after March 31, 2011,
4
only after the parties meet and confer further and the requesting party establishes the relevance
5
of the discovery sought to the claims or defenses in this action.
6
5. Crombie’s request to obtain “all” non-privileged documents contained in Paron’s
7
servers is denied, as the request is overly broad. The Court may consider particularized requests
8
with respect to these documents only after the parties meet and confer further and the requesting
9
party establishes the relevance of the discovery sought to the claims or defenses in this action.
10
6. Crombie’s request to obtain from Paron “all” documents that pertain to
11
Salesforce.com is denied based on Paron’s allegation that it has produced responsive
12
documents.
13
7. Crombie’s request to conduct depositions telephonically is denied without prejudice.
14
The parties must meet and confer further and submit to the Court a stipulation prior to the first
15
noticed deposition containing a detailed protocol addressing the parties’ use of a conference call
16
number and landlines, the exchange in advance of documents to be used during each deposition,
17
the payment of court-reporter fees, and any other issues that would assist the efficient
18
administration of justice.
19
20
21
22
23
8. Paron must serve a privilege log with respect to any documents it withheld from
production based on a claim of privilege by March 9, 2012.
9. This Court will inquire into the status of discovery at the settlement conference
currently scheduled for April 19, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
DATED: February 16, 2012
____________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-04577 CW (NC)
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
STATUS CONFERENCE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?