United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Paron Capital Management, LLC et al

Filing 81

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE 77 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 2/16/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 10 UNITED STATES COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-cv-04577 CW (NC) ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. No. 77 PARON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC and JAMES D. CROMBIE, Defendants. 16 17 The Court conducted a telephonic discovery status conference on February 15, 2012, to 18 address several discovery disputes raised in the parties’ joint statement, Dkt. No. 77. All parties 19 participated in the conference. Based on the representations made by the parties at the 20 conference, and the parties’ joint statement, the Court orders the following: 21 22 23 1. Crombie’s request to seek discovery from third-parties Nirvana Solutions, Spectrum Fund Administration, and Connie Lau is granted. 2. Crombie’s request to compel Peter McConnon and Timothy Lyons to respond to the 24 interrogatories and request for admission he served on each of them is denied without prejudice. 25 Crombie may renew his request after District Judge Wilken resolves the issue of whether 26 Crombie’s service of his third-party complaint on McConnon and Lyons was adequate. 27 28 3. Crombie’s request to remove the protective order currently governing Paron’s document production is denied for lack of good cause shown. Case No. 11-cv-04577 CW (NC) ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE 1 4. Crombie’s request to obtain from Paron discovery generated after March 31, 2011, is 2 denied, as Crombie has not established the relevance of the documents requested. The Court 3 may consider particularized requests with respect to discovery generated after March 31, 2011, 4 only after the parties meet and confer further and the requesting party establishes the relevance 5 of the discovery sought to the claims or defenses in this action. 6 5. Crombie’s request to obtain “all” non-privileged documents contained in Paron’s 7 servers is denied, as the request is overly broad. The Court may consider particularized requests 8 with respect to these documents only after the parties meet and confer further and the requesting 9 party establishes the relevance of the discovery sought to the claims or defenses in this action. 10 6. Crombie’s request to obtain from Paron “all” documents that pertain to 11 Salesforce.com is denied based on Paron’s allegation that it has produced responsive 12 documents. 13 7. Crombie’s request to conduct depositions telephonically is denied without prejudice. 14 The parties must meet and confer further and submit to the Court a stipulation prior to the first 15 noticed deposition containing a detailed protocol addressing the parties’ use of a conference call 16 number and landlines, the exchange in advance of documents to be used during each deposition, 17 the payment of court-reporter fees, and any other issues that would assist the efficient 18 administration of justice. 19 20 21 22 23 8. Paron must serve a privilege log with respect to any documents it withheld from production based on a claim of privilege by March 9, 2012. 9. This Court will inquire into the status of discovery at the settlement conference currently scheduled for April 19, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: February 16, 2012 ____________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-04577 CW (NC) ORDER RE: DISCOVERY STATUS CONFERENCE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?