Reyes v. San Francisco Unified School District
Filing
58
ORDER REGARDING MEET AND CONFER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND SETTING PRE-SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION CONFERENCE Pre-Summary Judgment Motion Conference set for Wednesday, 5/9/2012 11:00 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Oakalnd Courthouse.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/4/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
MARGARET REYES,
Plaintiff,
9
vs.
10
11
Northern District of California
ORDER REGARDING MEET AND CONFER
REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND
SETTING PRE-SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
CONFERENCE
SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
12
United States District Court
Case No.: 11-cv-04628-YGR
Defendant.
13
14
On May 2, 2012, the Court issued an Order Requiring Personal Appearance of Counsel to
15
Meet and Confer Regarding Discovery Dispute (“Order”). (Dkt. No. 54.) In that Order, counsel for
16
both parties was instructed to personally appear at the Federal Courthouse on Monday, May 7, 2012 at
17
8:30 a.m. The parties have filed numerous letters with the Court and contacted the Court by telephone
18
to reschedule the date and time on which they must appear. The Court notes that neither side has filed
19
an Administrative Motion for Relief on this issue. See Civ. L.R. 7-11. Lead counsel for both parties
20
is hereby ORDERED to appear at the Federal Courthouse on Wednesday, May 9, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.
21
At this time, the Court will address the pending discovery issues with the parties if they have not
22
already been resolved. The parties shall have met and conferred in person prior to May 9 at 11:00
23
a.m.
24
The Court will further hold a pre-summary judgment motion conference at this time. See
25
Standing Order in Civil Cases, Section 9(a). On April 26, 2012, Counter-defendants filed a pre-
26
conference letter with the Court seeking leave to file a summary judgment motion. (Dkt. No. 52.) To
27
date, the San Francisco Unified School District has failed to respond despite the Standing Order
28
requirement that a response be filed within three (3) business days. If no response is filed by Monday,
1
May 7, 2012, the Court will interpret the failure to respond as an admission of good cause for the
2
filing of Counter-defendants’ summary judgment motion.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 4, 2012
_________________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?