Reyes v. San Francisco Unified School District

Filing 58

ORDER REGARDING MEET AND CONFER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND SETTING PRE-SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION CONFERENCE Pre-Summary Judgment Motion Conference set for Wednesday, 5/9/2012 11:00 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in the Oakalnd Courthouse.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/4/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 MARGARET REYES, Plaintiff, 9 vs. 10 11 Northern District of California ORDER REGARDING MEET AND CONFER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND SETTING PRE-SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION CONFERENCE SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, 12 United States District Court Case No.: 11-cv-04628-YGR Defendant. 13 14 On May 2, 2012, the Court issued an Order Requiring Personal Appearance of Counsel to 15 Meet and Confer Regarding Discovery Dispute (“Order”). (Dkt. No. 54.) In that Order, counsel for 16 both parties was instructed to personally appear at the Federal Courthouse on Monday, May 7, 2012 at 17 8:30 a.m. The parties have filed numerous letters with the Court and contacted the Court by telephone 18 to reschedule the date and time on which they must appear. The Court notes that neither side has filed 19 an Administrative Motion for Relief on this issue. See Civ. L.R. 7-11. Lead counsel for both parties 20 is hereby ORDERED to appear at the Federal Courthouse on Wednesday, May 9, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. 21 At this time, the Court will address the pending discovery issues with the parties if they have not 22 already been resolved. The parties shall have met and conferred in person prior to May 9 at 11:00 23 a.m. 24 The Court will further hold a pre-summary judgment motion conference at this time. See 25 Standing Order in Civil Cases, Section 9(a). On April 26, 2012, Counter-defendants filed a pre- 26 conference letter with the Court seeking leave to file a summary judgment motion. (Dkt. No. 52.) To 27 date, the San Francisco Unified School District has failed to respond despite the Standing Order 28 requirement that a response be filed within three (3) business days. If no response is filed by Monday, 1 May 7, 2012, the Court will interpret the failure to respond as an admission of good cause for the 2 filing of Counter-defendants’ summary judgment motion. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2012 _________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?