Mikich et al v. County of San Francisco et al
Filing
109
ORDER DISMISSING CASE in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 120 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/4/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHARLES MIKICH, et al.,
Case No. 11-cv-04629-DMR
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
9
10
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
The court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice;
15
provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 120 days, with proof
16
of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement
17
has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith
18
be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. All further dates are vacated.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2016
______________________________________
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?