Mikich et al v. County of San Francisco et al

Filing 109

ORDER DISMISSING CASE in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 120 days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. Signed by Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/4/2016. (dmrlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CHARLES MIKICH, et al.,

Case No. 11-cv-04629-DMR

Plaintiffs,
8
v.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

9
10

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

The court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,

14

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice;

15

provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within 120 days, with proof

16

of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement

17

has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith

18

be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. All further dates are vacated.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2016
______________________________________
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge