McK. v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District et al
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
Kathryn E. Dobel, SBN 85530
Law Office of Kathryn Dobel
1700 Shattuck Avenue, 77
Berkeley, CA 94709
Telephone: 510.548.2004
Facsimile: 510.666.1315
Cellular: 510.301.4994
spedlaw@comcast.net
5
6
Attorney for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
G. McK., BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN
AD LITEM, K. McK.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. C-11-04661- CW
14
15
16
17
SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT, ANN DODSON, and CONNIE
KHANACHET, and DOES 1-20,
Defendants.
18
19
20
_____________________________________
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding
21
ADR and have reached the following stipulations pursuant to Civil
22
L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
23
1.) The parties agree to participate in Mediation (ADR L.R. 6).
24
2.) The parties agree to hold the ADR session within 120 days
25
from the date of the Order.
26
27
Dated: 12/20/11
_________/s/_______________________________
Kathryn E. Dobel
Attorney for Plaintiff
28
STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS; G. MCK. v.
SAN RAMON VALLEY U.S.D.
-1-
C-11-04661-CW
1
Dated: _12/20/11
2
3
______/s/_________________________________
Katherine A. Alberts
STUBBS & LEONE
Attorneys for Defendants
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER
5
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to the Stipulation set forth above, this matter is
hereby referred to Mediation. The deadline for holding the ADR
session is 90 days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: 12/21/2011
12
___________________________________
HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
cc:ADR
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS; G. MCK. v.
SAN RAMON VALLEY U.S.D.
-2-
C-11-04661-CW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?