McK. v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District et al

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/21/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Kathryn E. Dobel, SBN 85530 Law Office of Kathryn Dobel 1700 Shattuck Avenue, 77 Berkeley, CA 94709 Telephone: 510.548.2004 Facsimile: 510.666.1315 Cellular: 510.301.4994 spedlaw@comcast.net 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 G. McK., BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, K. McK., STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Plaintiff, 13 Case No. C-11-04661- CW 14 15 16 17 SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, ANN DODSON, and CONNIE KHANACHET, and DOES 1-20, Defendants. 18 19 20 _____________________________________ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding 21 ADR and have reached the following stipulations pursuant to Civil 22 L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 23 1.) The parties agree to participate in Mediation (ADR L.R. 6). 24 2.) The parties agree to hold the ADR session within 120 days 25 from the date of the Order. 26 27 Dated: 12/20/11 _________/s/_______________________________ Kathryn E. Dobel Attorney for Plaintiff 28 STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS; G. MCK. v. SAN RAMON VALLEY U.S.D. -1- C-11-04661-CW 1 Dated: _12/20/11 2 3 ______/s/_________________________________ Katherine A. Alberts STUBBS & LEONE Attorneys for Defendants 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER 5 6 7 8 9 Pursuant to the Stipulation set forth above, this matter is hereby referred to Mediation. The deadline for holding the ADR session is 90 days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: 12/21/2011 12 ___________________________________ HONORABLE CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 cc:ADR 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS; G. MCK. v. SAN RAMON VALLEY U.S.D. -2- C-11-04661-CW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?