Centrify Corporation v. Quest Software, Inc.

Filing 6

ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 10/7/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

Case4:11-cv-04675-DMR Document5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Filed10/06/11 Page1 of 2

COOLEY LLP
THOMAS J. FRIEL, JR. (80065)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
WAYNE O. STACY (pro hac vice pending)
([e-mail])
ORION ARMON (pro hac vice pending)
([e-mail])
COOLEY LLP
380 Interlocken Crescent
Suite 900
Broomfield, CO 80021-8023
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Quest Software, Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

OAKLAND DIVISION

15

CENTRIFY CORPORATION,

16
17
18
19

Case No. 4:11-cv-4675-DMR

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND ANSWER
DEADLINE FOR QUEST
SOFTWARE, INC.

v.
QUEST SOFTWARE, INC.,
Defendant.

20
21

Plaintiff Centrify Corp. and Defendant Quest Software, Inc., by and through their

22

respective counsel, hereby stipulate to a thirty-day extension of time for Quest Software to move,

23

answer, or otherwise respond to Centrify’s Complaint, up to and including November 17, 2011.

24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Case No. 4:11-cv-04675-DMR

1.

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND ANSWER
DEADLINE

Case4:11-cv-04675-DMR Document5

1

Dated: October 6, 2011

Filed10/06/11 Page2 of 2

COOLEY LLP

2
3

/s/ Thomas J. Friel, Jr.
Thomas J. Friel, Jr. (State Bar No. 80065)

4

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT QUEST
SOFTWARE, INC.

5
6
7

Dated: October 6, 2011

8

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
/s/ Edward V. Anderson
Edward V. Anderson (State Bar No. 83148)

9

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CENTRIFY
CORP.

10

RT

Dated: October ____, 2011

A

H

ER

R NIA

Judge D

FO

. Ryu
onna M

NO

14

VED
APPRO

LI

13

UNIT
ED

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

12

S

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

15
The Honorable Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

16
17
18

ATTESTATION CLAUSE

19
20

I, Thomas J. Friel, Jr., hereby attest in accordance with General Order No. 45.X(B) that

21

Edward V. Anderson, counsel for Plaintiff Centrify Corp., has provided his concurrence with the

22

electronic filing of the foregoing document entitled STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

23

ORDER TO EXTEND ANSWER DEADLINE.

24

Dated: October 6, 2011

By: /s/ Thomas J. Friel, Jr.
Thomas J. Friel, Jr.

25
26
27

363696 v1/CO

28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Case No. 4:11-cv-04675-DMR

2.

STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND ANSWER
DEADLINE