Thomas v. Cate
Filing
4
ORDER GRANTING 3 MOTION TO STAY HABEAS PROCEEDINGS; GRANTING[ 2] LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE UNTIL STAY IS LIFTED. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/26/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
LARRY DARNELL THOMAS,
4
Petitioner,
5
6
7
No. C 11-04709 CW (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY
HABEAS PROCEEDINGS; GRANTING
LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS; DIRECTING CLERK OF
THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY
CLOSE CASE UNTIL STAY IS LIFTED
v.
MATTHEW CATE,
Respondent.
/
8
9
(Docket nos. 2, 3)
Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
11
also has filed a motion to stay the petition while he exhausts his
12
ineffective assistance of counsel claims in state court.
Petitioner
13
A district court may stay a mixed habeas petition, i.e., a
14
petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims, to allow
15
the petitioner to exhaust state court remedies as to those claims
16
that have not yet been presented to the state's highest court.
17
Rhines v. Webber, 544 U.S. 269, 277–78 (2005).
18
Supreme Court discussed the stay-and-abeyance procedure, explaining
19
that a stay and abeyance "is only appropriate when the district
20
court determines there was good cause for the petitioner's failure
21
to exhaust his claims first in state court," the claims are not
22
meritless, and there are no intentionally dilatory litigation
23
tactics by the petitioner.
24
petitioner does not have to worry that his newly-exhausted claims
25
will be barred by the statute of limitations because those claims
26
remain pending in federal court.
27
1139, 1140 (9th Cir. 2009).
28
Id.
See
In Rhines, the
If the stay is granted, the
King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133,
1
Here, it appears that good cause exists for Petitioner's
2
failure to exhaust his claims of ineffective assistance of trial
3
and appellate counsel on direct appeal because such claims must be
4
raised by way of state habeas corpus.
5
cognizable bases for federal habeas relief.
6
Petitioner's first habeas petition, and there is no evidence that
7
he seeks the stay for improper purposes.
8
GRANTS Petitioner's request for a stay.
9
Moreover, the claims state
Further, this is
Accordingly, the Court
These proceedings are hereby STAYED pending Petitioner's
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
exhaustion of his state judicial remedies.
11
take place in this action until the Court decides further action is
12
appropriate or until Petitioner exhausts the unexhausted claims
13
and, within thirty days of doing so, moves to reopen this action
14
and lift the stay.
15
16
17
18
Nothing further will
Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
GRANTED.
The Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the file
pending the stay of this action.
19
This Order terminates Docket nos. 2 and 3.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: 10/26/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
LARRY D THOMAS,
Case Number: CV11-04709 CW
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
MATTHEW CATE et al,
Defendant.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on October 26, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located
in the Clerk's office.
13
14
17
Larry Darnell Thomas V91749
3C05 104Low
CSP - Corcoran
P.O. Box 3471
Corcoran, CA 93212-3471
18
Dated: October 26, 2011
15
16
19
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?