Thomas v. Cate

Filing 4

ORDER GRANTING 3 MOTION TO STAY HABEAS PROCEEDINGS; GRANTING[ 2] LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE UNTIL STAY IS LIFTED. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 10/26/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 LARRY DARNELL THOMAS, 4 Petitioner, 5 6 7 No. C 11-04709 CW (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY HABEAS PROCEEDINGS; GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE CASE UNTIL STAY IS LIFTED v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent. / 8 9 (Docket nos. 2, 3) Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed this petition for a United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 11 also has filed a motion to stay the petition while he exhausts his 12 ineffective assistance of counsel claims in state court. Petitioner 13 A district court may stay a mixed habeas petition, i.e., a 14 petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims, to allow 15 the petitioner to exhaust state court remedies as to those claims 16 that have not yet been presented to the state's highest court. 17 Rhines v. Webber, 544 U.S. 269, 277–78 (2005). 18 Supreme Court discussed the stay-and-abeyance procedure, explaining 19 that a stay and abeyance "is only appropriate when the district 20 court determines there was good cause for the petitioner's failure 21 to exhaust his claims first in state court," the claims are not 22 meritless, and there are no intentionally dilatory litigation 23 tactics by the petitioner. 24 petitioner does not have to worry that his newly-exhausted claims 25 will be barred by the statute of limitations because those claims 26 remain pending in federal court. 27 1139, 1140 (9th Cir. 2009). 28 Id. See In Rhines, the If the stay is granted, the King v. Ryan, 564 F.3d 1133, 1 Here, it appears that good cause exists for Petitioner's 2 failure to exhaust his claims of ineffective assistance of trial 3 and appellate counsel on direct appeal because such claims must be 4 raised by way of state habeas corpus. 5 cognizable bases for federal habeas relief. 6 Petitioner's first habeas petition, and there is no evidence that 7 he seeks the stay for improper purposes. 8 GRANTS Petitioner's request for a stay. 9 Moreover, the claims state Further, this is Accordingly, the Court These proceedings are hereby STAYED pending Petitioner's United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 exhaustion of his state judicial remedies. 11 take place in this action until the Court decides further action is 12 appropriate or until Petitioner exhausts the unexhausted claims 13 and, within thirty days of doing so, moves to reopen this action 14 and lift the stay. 15 16 17 18 Nothing further will Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the file pending the stay of this action. 19 This Order terminates Docket nos. 2 and 3. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: 10/26/2011 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 LARRY D THOMAS, Case Number: CV11-04709 CW 4 5 6 7 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. MATTHEW CATE et al, Defendant. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on October 26, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 17 Larry Darnell Thomas V91749 3C05 104Low CSP - Corcoran P.O. Box 3471 Corcoran, CA 93212-3471 18 Dated: October 26, 2011 15 16 19 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?