Binaley v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 et al
Filing
39
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court VACATES the January 22, 2013 hearing. Parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed form of judgment within fourteen (14) days. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
LOUIS M. BINALEY,
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
9
10
Case No.: 11-cv-04722-YGR
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1,
et al.,
Defendants.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
On December 18, 2012, Defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 filed a Motion for
Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Adjudication. (Dkt. No. 31.) On
January 2, 2013, Plaintiff Louis Binaley filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendants’ Motion
14
for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 38.) Plaintiff states that the non-opposition has been filed after
15
due consideration of Ninth Circuit authority and a diligent consideration of the potential evidentiary
16
basis to distinguish such authority. (Id.) No reply was filed by Defendants.
17
The Court finds that this motion, which has been noticed for hearing on January 22, 2013, is
18
appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and
19
Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the Court VACATES the January 22, 2013 hearing.
20
In light of Plaintiff’s non-opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court hereby
21
GRANTS that motion. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed form of judgment
22
within fourteen (14) days. This Order terminates Dkt. No. 31.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: January 11, 2013
26
27
28
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?