Jones v. City of Oakland et al
Filing
72
ORDER to Allow Laptop in Courthouse for use at trial in this matter; as to counsel for Defendants Perez-Angeles and Daza-Quiroz.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/4/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
John J. Verber, CASB# 139917
Aimee Hamoy-Perera, CASB# 221228
BURNHAM BROWN
A Professional Law Corporation
P.O. Box 119
Oakland, California 94604
--1901 Harrison Street, 14th Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone:
(510) 444-6800
Facsimile:
(510) 835-6666
Email:
jverber@burnhambrown.com
ahamoy-perera@burnhambrown.com
Attorneys for Defendants
ERIBERTO PEREZ-ANGELES and OMAR
DAZA-QUIROZ
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
LANELL MONIQUE JONES, et al.,
15
No. 4:11-cv-04725-YGR
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED ORDER
TO ALLOW LAPTOP IN
COURTHOUSE
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,
18
Complaint Filed: September 22, 2011
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
Defendants’ ERIBERTO PEREZ-ANGELES and OMAR DAZA-QUIROZ request that
their counsel John J. Verber and Aimee Hamoy-Perera be permitted to gain access to the
courthouse with each of their laptops for use at trial in the above-referenced matter.
23
24
DATED: March 4, 2013
BURNHAM BROWN
25
By
/s/
JOHN J. VERBER
Attorneys for Defendants
ERIBERTO PEREZ-ANGELES and
OMAR DAZA-QUIROZ
26
27
28
1
DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED ORDER TO
ALLOW LAPTOP IN COURTHOUSE
No. 4:11-cv-04725-YGR
1
Upon review of this application, defense counsel John J. Verber and Aimee Hamoy-
2
Perera are allowed to bring their laptops to Courtroom 5 for use at trial from March 11 until the
3
conclusion of the trial in this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Date: March 4, 2013
HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
4826-7683-8163, v. 1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DEFENDANTS’ PROPOSED ORDER TO
ALLOW LAPTOP IN COURTHOUSE
No. 4:11-cv-04725-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?