Sims et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Filing
38
ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/3/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
MICHAEL SIMS,
12
13
Plaintiff(s),
No. C-11-04768 YGR (DMR)
ORDER
v.
14
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,
15
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
The court scheduled an April 10, 2012 settlement conference in this matter. The scheduling
18
order required all parties to submit certain settlement materials, as well as to make a personal
19
appearance at the settlement conference. Plaintiffs Michael Sims and Sudie Sims did not submit
20
settlement statements, nor did they appear at the April 10 conference. As a result, the court ordered
21
Plaintiffs to show cause by filing a written statement by no later than April 20, 2012 explaining
22
these failures. (Docket No. 28).
23
The court subsequently engaged in telephonic settlement discussions with Michael Sims, as
24
well as with counsel for Defendant. The court explained to Mr. Sims that Plaintiffs were not
25
excused from making a timely response to the court's order to show cause; nevertheless, Plaintiffs
26
failed to file a response. On April 30, 2012, Defendant filed a Notice of Non-Compliance,
27
requesting terminating sanctions.
28
1
The court does not recommend terminating sanctions as a remedy for the violations that are
2
the subject of this order. However, the court admonishes Plaintiffs for their failure to follow two
3
direct court orders (the settlement conference scheduling order, as well as the order to show cause),
4
and notes that Plaintiffs' behavior is indicative of a failure to prosecute their case.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: May 3, 2012
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?