Goten Corporation v. Velocity Fulfillment, Inc.
Filing
12
ORDER re 11 Permitting Plaintiff to Appear Telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/30/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
Timothy P. Dillon, SBN 190839
Sunjina K. Ahuja, SBN 226130
Dillon & Gerardi, APC
4660 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 1040
San Diego, CA 92122
Telephone: (858) 587-1800
Facsimile: (858) 587-2587
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff, GOTEN CORPORATION
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
GOTEN CORPORATION, a California
corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
vs.
VELOCITY FULFILLMENT, INC., an
Arizona corporation,
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: C11-04824
[PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING
PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY AS MODIFIED
Date: January 11, 2012
Time: 1:30 pm
Judge: Hon. Donna M. Ryu
Complaint Filed: September 29, 2011
Having reviewed the file and the request of counsel for Plaintiff Goten Corporation (“Goten”),
and for good cause appearing,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT lead counsel for Plaintiff Goten may appear telephonically
24
at the Initial Case management Conference on January 11, 2012 at 1:30 P.M. One week prior to the
25
scheduled telephonic conference, counsel for Plaintiff shall contact Judge Ryu's Courtroom Deputy,
26
Ivy Garcia, at (510) 637-3639, to obtain the court's call-in number for the telephonic conference.
27
28
1
Case No. C11-04824
[PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY
3
FO
LI
ER
A
H
6
M. Ryu
onna
________________________________________
Judge D
Judge of the Northern District Court of California
RT
5
Dated: __December 30, 2011_____
NO
4
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
2
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. C11-04824
[PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?