Goten Corporation v. Velocity Fulfillment, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Permitting Plaintiff to Appear Telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 12/30/2011. (dmrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Timothy P. Dillon, SBN 190839 Sunjina K. Ahuja, SBN 226130 Dillon & Gerardi, APC 4660 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 1040 San Diego, CA 92122 Telephone: (858) 587-1800 Facsimile: (858) 587-2587 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GOTEN CORPORATION 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 GOTEN CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 vs. VELOCITY FULFILLMENT, INC., an Arizona corporation, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: C11-04824 [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AS MODIFIED Date: January 11, 2012 Time: 1:30 pm Judge: Hon. Donna M. Ryu Complaint Filed: September 29, 2011 Having reviewed the file and the request of counsel for Plaintiff Goten Corporation (“Goten”), and for good cause appearing, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT lead counsel for Plaintiff Goten may appear telephonically 24 at the Initial Case management Conference on January 11, 2012 at 1:30 P.M. One week prior to the 25 scheduled telephonic conference, counsel for Plaintiff shall contact Judge Ryu's Courtroom Deputy, 26 Ivy Garcia, at (510) 637-3639, to obtain the court's call-in number for the telephonic conference. 27 28 1 Case No. C11-04824 [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY 3 FO LI ER A H 6 M. Ryu onna ________________________________________ Judge D Judge of the Northern District Court of California RT 5 Dated: __December 30, 2011_____ NO 4 R NIA S UNIT ED 2 D RDERE OO IT IS S RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. C11-04824 [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?