Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. Hayward Glass Company, Inc. et al

Filing 8

ORDER re 7 Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) filed by I.U.P.A.T. Union and Industry National Pension Fund, Marian Bourboulis, Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan, Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Plan, James Williams, Douglas Christopher, District Council No. 16 International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, John Maggiore, District Council 16 Northern California Journeyman and Apprentice Training Trust Fund, District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund. Signed by Judge Beeler on 10/28/2011. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2011)

1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
[phone]
4 [phone]– Facsimile
[e-mail]
5 [e-mail]
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS,
ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS
13 WORKERS PENSION PLAN, et al.
Plaintiffs,

14
15

Case No.: C11-4926 LB
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
RE DEFENDANT MARY TAUSHECK
ONLY

v.

16 HAYWARD GLASS COMPANY, INC., a
California Corporation, and DAVID BRIAN
17 TAUSHECK, an individual, and MARY
TAUSHECK, an individual,
18
Defendants.
19
20
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to F.R.C.P., Rule 41(a)(1), Plaintiffs
21
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA GLAZIERS, ARCHITECTURAL METAL AND GLASS
22
WORKERS PENSION PLAN, et al., voluntarily dismiss, without prejudice, their claim against
23
Defendant MARY TAUSHECK only.
24
Defendant Mary Tausheck has not served an Answer or otherwise appeared in this matter,
25
and Plaintiffs have not previously filed or dismissed any similar action against Defendant Mary
26
Tausheck.
27
Plaintiffs have entered into a settlement agreement with Defendants Hayward Glass
28
-1NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
RE DEFENDANT MARY TAUSHECK ONLY
Case No.: C11-4926 LB

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Hayward Glass\Pleadings\Complaint 2011\C11-4926 LB Dismissal re Mary Tausheck 101911.doc

1 Company, Inc. and David Brian Tausheck, and therefore Plaintiffs’ action will proceed against
2 those two defendants only.
3

Plaintiffs therefore dismiss Defendant Mary Tausheck from this action, and request that the

4 Court retain jurisdiction over this matter.
5

I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above-

6 entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge.
7 Executed this 19th day of October, 2011, at San Francisco, California.
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION

8
9
10

By: /S/Blake E. Williams
Blake E. Williams
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14

23

R NIA

LI

ER

FO

aure
Judge L

H

22

RT

21

l Beeler

NO

20

RDE

OO
IT IS S

A

19

_________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RED

UNIT
ED

18

TA

RT
U
O

17 Date: ____________________
October 28, 2011

S

Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Defendant Mary Tausheck is
hereby dismissed from this action without prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this
15
matter.
S DISTRICT
16
TE
C

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
-2NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
RE DEFENDANT MARY TAUSHECK ONLY
Case No.: C11-4926 LB

P:\CLIENTS\GLACL\Hayward Glass\Pleadings\Complaint 2011\C11-4926 LB Dismissal re Mary Tausheck 101911.doc