Maidhof et al v. Celaya et al

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time in which to answer or otherwise respond to complaint re 15 . Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 01/11/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Case4:11-cv-04971-LB Document15 Filed01/09/12 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
WILLIAM J. CARROLL (CSB #118106)
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Street Tower
Thirty-Second Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
MITCHELL CELAYA, HARRY LEGRANDE,
MARC DECOULODE, and ROBERT J.
BIRGENEAU

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

CALLIE MAIDOF, et al.,

13

Case No. 11-cv-4971 LB

Plaintiffs,

14

v.

15

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN
WHICH TO ANSWER OR
OTHERWISE PLEAD TO
COMPLAINT

MITCHELL CELAYA, HARRY
LEGRANDE, MARC DECOULODE, and
ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU,

16
17

Defendants.

18
The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate as

19
20

follows:

21

Plaintiffs filed the above-captioned complaint on December 27, 2011.

22

Accordingly, Defendants must file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint by

23

January 10, 2012.
The parties have agreed to extend the time in which defendants are to answer or otherwise

24
25

respond to the complaint.
The parties stipulate that if defendants decide to answer the complaint, their answer will

26
27

be due on or before January 24, 2012.

28

///

SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

-1-

CASE NO. 11-CV-4971

LB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO COMPLAINT

Case4:11-cv-04971-LB Document15 Filed01/09/12 Page2 of 2

1
2

The parties stipulate that if defendants decide to file a motion to dismiss the complaint,
pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), the following briefing schedule would be in effect:

3

Defendants will file their opening brief on or before January 24, 2012.

4

Plaintiffs will file their response brief on or before February 14, 2012.

5

Defendants will file their reply brief on or before February 28, 2012.

6

The parties request a hearing date of April 5, 2012.

7

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

8

Dated: January 9, 2012

SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
By: /s/ William J. Carroll
WILLIAM J. CARROLL
Attorneys for DefendantsMITCHELL
CELAYA, HARRY LEGRANDE, MARC
DECOULODE, and ROBERT J.
BIRGENEAU

9
10
11
12
Dated: January 9, 2012

SIEGEL & YEE

13
By: /s/ Daniel Siegel
DANIEL SIEGEL
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14
15
16

I attest and certify under Northern District General Order 45(x) that I received permission

17

from plaintiffs’ counsel before e-filing this document and will retain proof of this permission in

18

compliance with 45(x).

19

Dated: January 9, 2012

20

By: /s/ William J. Carroll
WILLIAM J. CARROLL
Attorneys for DefendantsMITCHELL
CELAYA, HARRY LEGRANDE, MARC
DECOULODE, and ROBERT J.
BIRGENEAU

21
22
23
24

SCHIFF HARDIN LLP

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

January 11, 2012
DATED:_____________________

____________________________________
Hon. Laurel Beeler
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28
SCHIFF HARDIN LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

SF\320118501.1

-2-

CASE NO. 11-CV-4971 LB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO COMPLAINT