SunEarth Inc. et al v. Sun Earth Solar Power Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
185
AMENDED 165 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/22/2013. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2013)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
SUNEARTH, INC.; and THE SOLARAY
CORPORATION,
5
Plaintiffs,
6
7
8
9
SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD.;
NBSOLAR USA, INC.; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
________________________________/
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
For the reasons set forth in the Court’s Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law,
12
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
That judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs SunEarth,
Inc. and The Solaray Corporation on their claims for (1) trademark
and trade name infringement under the Lanham Ace, 15 U.S.C.
§§ 1125(a), et seq., California law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. C. §§ 14415
and 14402, and common law and (2) cybersquatting under the
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d),
as to the sunearth.us domain only, and
20
21
That the United States Patent and Trademark Office cancel
Defendants’ Trademark Registration No. 3,886,941, and
22
23
That Defendants’ counterclaims against Plaintiffs are
dismissed with prejudice.
24
25
26
27
28
AMENDED JUDGMENT
v.
10
11
No. C 11-4991 CW
The Court shall separately enter a Permanent Injunction.
/
/
/
1
Plaintiffs shall recover their costs from Defendants.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: 11/22/2013
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?