Upshaw v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 25

ORDER Instructing Plaintiff to Correct Docket Entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 5/31/2012. (hlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

KAZEEM UPSHAW,

9

ORDER INSTRUCTING PLAINTIFF TO
CORRECT DOCKET ENTRY

v.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,

No. C 11-05044 DMR

CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.,

12

Defendants.
___________________________________/

13
14

Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a revised amended complaint naming Jonathan

15

Muniz, Ercivan Martin, Jose Pereznegron and Richardson Sanandes as Defendants. Doc. no. 23.

16

Because Plaintiff improperly filed the motion on the court’s Electronic Case Filing system as an ex

17

parte motion, the Clerk instructed Plaintiff’s counsel to re-file the motion. On May 30, 2012,

18

Plaintiff erroneously e-filed another ex parte motion. Doc. no. 24.

19

The court instructs Plaintiff to correct the docket entry for the pending motion for leave to

20

file a revised amended complaint so as to remove the ex parte designation. Instructions for

21

correcting docket entries and contacting the ECF Help Desk are available on the court’s ECF

22

website: ecf.cand.uscourts.gov. Counsel is instructed to study and follow carefully the e-filing

23

procedures in all future filings.

24

The briefing deadlines on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend remain unchanged.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: May 31, 2012

27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge