ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al
Filing
110
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' LETTER BRIEF CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS re 109 Letter, filed by Security One International, Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/27/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2012)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
8
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
10
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ LETTER BRIEF
CONCERNING CONFIDENTIALITY
DESIGNATIONS
SECURITY ONE INT’L, INC. et al.,
11
Case No.: 11-CV-05149 YGR
Defendants.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
The Court has reviewed the parties’ Letter Brief Concerning Confidentiality Designations,
14
(Dkt. No. 109). The Court previously ordered Security One to produce its customer list to allow ADT
15
to compare that list with a list of former ADT customers to determine which of Security One’s current
16
customers used to be ADT customers. (Dkt. No. 94.) ADT has since compiled a list of the results of
17
the cross-referencing procedure (the “cross referencing list”). The Court understands the parties’
18
dispute to be whether the confidentiality designation of the “cross-referencing list” should be changed
19
from “Attorneys’ Eyes Only-Highly Confidential” to “Confidential” to permit non-attorney members
20
of ADT’s in-house legal department to review the “cross-referencing list.”
21
The Court ORDERS as follows:
22
1)
23
with respect to ADT.
24
2)
25
the “cross-referencing list” to assist in ADT’s investigation and to provide assistance in
26
compiling documents responsive to Security One’s discovery requests:
The “cross-referencing list” will remain “Attorneys’ Eyes Only-Highly Confidential”
The following non-attorney members of ADT’s in-house legal department may review
27
Paralegals; and
28
Legal interns from accredited law schools that are currently on staff.
1
3)
2
“Acknowledgement and Agreement to be Bound” as required by the Protective Order.
3
4)
4
Concerning Confidentiality Designations (Dkt. No. 109). With the understanding of the
5
Court’s position on the issues addressed in this Order, the parties shall meet and confer to
6
resolve any remaining issues not addressed in this Order.
7
5)
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
Any individual that reviews the “cross-referencing list” must sign the
The Court will not take any further action with respect to the parties’ Letter Brief
The Court will not issue sanctions at this time.
Date: August 27, 2012
_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?