ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al
Filing
132
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 131 . Settlement Conference set for 11/29/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/17/12. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Andrew Winghart, Esq.
drew@winghartlaw.com
WINGHART LAW GROUP
495 Seaport Court, Suite 104
Redwood City, CA 94063
Telephone: (510) 593-8546
Fax: (866) 941-8593
John O’Bryan, Esq.
jobryan@freebornpeters.com
Megan Kokontis, Esq.
mkokontis@freebornpeters.com
FREEBORN & PETERS LLP
311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: (312) 360-6000
Fax: (312) 360-6520
11
12
Attorneys for Defendants Security One
International, Inc. and Claudio Hand
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
CIVIL ACTION No. C 11-05149-YGR
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
____________
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
19
20
21
SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
CLAUDIO HAND, SCELLUSALEADS and
PURE CLAR,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Defendants.
22
23
24
After considering the request submitted by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
25
the settlement conference is continued to November 29, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall submit
26
their settlement conference statements no later than November 21, 2012.
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
5
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-5149-YGR
S
UNIT
ED
DATED: __________________
October 17, 2012
RT
U
O
3
NO
ER
usins
6
A
H
5
ael M. Co
LI
than
Judge Na
RT
4
R NIA
The Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins
DERED
SO OR
United IStates Magistrate Judge
IT S
2
FO
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
________________________________________________
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
6
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-5149-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?