ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al

Filing 132

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 131 . Settlement Conference set for 11/29/2012 09:30 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/17/12. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Andrew Winghart, Esq. drew@winghartlaw.com WINGHART LAW GROUP 495 Seaport Court, Suite 104 Redwood City, CA 94063 Telephone: (510) 593-8546 Fax: (866) 941-8593 John O’Bryan, Esq. jobryan@freebornpeters.com Megan Kokontis, Esq. mkokontis@freebornpeters.com FREEBORN & PETERS LLP 311 South Wacker Drive, Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606 Telephone: (312) 360-6000 Fax: (312) 360-6520 11 12 Attorneys for Defendants Security One International, Inc. and Claudio Hand 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 CIVIL ACTION No. C 11-05149-YGR ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., ____________ [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff, 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., CLAUDIO HAND, SCELLUSALEADS and PURE CLAR, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. 22 23 24 After considering the request submitted by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 25 the settlement conference is continued to November 29, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. Parties shall submit 26 their settlement conference statements no later than November 21, 2012. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 5 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-5149-YGR S UNIT ED DATED: __________________ October 17, 2012 RT U O 3 NO ER usins 6 A H 5 ael M. Co LI than Judge Na RT 4 R NIA The Honorable Nathanael M. Cousins DERED SO OR United IStates Magistrate Judge IT S 2 FO 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA ________________________________________________ N F D IS T IC T O R C 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT REQUEST TO CONTINUE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 6 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-5149-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?