ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al

Filing 200

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 199 To Amend the Complaint, filed by Security One International, Inc., ADT Security Services, Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 3/29/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 David J. Millstein, Esq. (SBN 8) MILLSTEIN & ASSOCIATES 100 The Embarcadero, Suite 200 San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: 415.348-0348 Fax: 415.348-0336 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADT Security Services, Inc. 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., CIVIL ACTION No. C 11-05149 YGR 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. STIPULATION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., CLAUDIO HAND, and SAFE HOME SECURITY, INC., 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 11-05149 YGR 1 The parties, Plaintiff ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., and Defendants SECURITY 2 ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., and CLAUDIO HAND, hereby stipulate to the filing of the 3 Fourth Amended Complaint (a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as “Exhibit 1”), 4 and ask the Court for leave to file it. The Fourth Amended Complaint pares the current pleading 5 6 from twelve claims to three; removes all claims for relief based on willful misconduct; eliminates 7 the defendants’ exposure to awards of punitive damages and attorney fees; more accurately 8 reflects the proof that plaintiff expects to present at trial; and simplifies the case for trial. The 9 Fourth Amended Complaint asserts no new claim not already encompassed by the current 10 11 complaint. The Fourth Amended Complaint will require no additional discovery or pretrial practice. 12 13 Both current Defendants, CLAUDIO HAND and SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, 14 INC., by their counsel agree to the amendment. If the Court grants ADT leave to file this Fourth 15 Amended Complaint, Defendants will not move to dismiss the new complaint, and instead will 16 raise any Rule 12(b)(6) defenses to the new complaint in their answer. The parties respectfully 17 request that Defendants’ answer be due 21 days after service of the Fourth Amended Complaint. 18 So stipulated. 19 Dated: March 28, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 20 21 22 23 MILLSTEIN & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ David J. Millstein David J. Millstein Attorneys for the Plaintiff, ADT Security Services, Inc. 24 25 26 27 FREEBORN & PETERS LLP By: /s/ John O’Bryan John O’Bryan Attorneys for Defendants Security One International and Claudio Hand 28 2 STIPULATION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 11-05149 YGR 1 2 3 4 5 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1 I, David J. Millstein, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and Proposed Order. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 28th day of March 2013, at San Francisco, California. 6 /s/ David J. Millstein David J. Millstein 7 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 Dated: March 29, 2013. __________________________________ United States District Judge Gonzalez Rogers 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C 11-05149 YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?