ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF re 202 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Security One International, Inc., Claudio Hand, ADT Security Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/9/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
Case No.: 11-CV-05149 YGR
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ JOINT
DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF
SECURITY ONE INT’L, INC. et al.,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
The parties have filed a Joint Discovery Letter Brief, (Dkt. No. 202), which asks the Court to
resolve the following discovery issue:
Whether ADT should be permitted, outside of the constraints of ordinary merits
discovery, to depose former ADT customers and defendant Claudio Hand concerning
alleged violations of the terms of the Court’s January 3, 2013, order barring the use of
false claims of affiliation with alarm system manufacturers GE and Honeywell.
The Court understands that “Security One has agreed to depositions concerning complaints
that ADT first became aware of on or after March 15.” Accordingly, the Court will address only
those depositions to which Security One has not agreed—depositions concerning complaints that
ADT first became aware of before March 15, 2013.
ADT has not made a sufficiently persuasive showing that Defendants have violated the terms
of the Court’s January 3, 2013 Order so as to justify ordering the requested discovery.
Without further order of the Court, the use of any agreed to depositions shall be limited to
proving violations of the injunction.
This Order Terminates Docket Number 202.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: April 9, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?