ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al

Filing 203

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF re 202 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Security One International, Inc., Claudio Hand, ADT Security Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/9/13. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., 7 8 Plaintiff, Case No.: 11-CV-05149 YGR ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF vs. 9 SECURITY ONE INT’L, INC. et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 The parties have filed a Joint Discovery Letter Brief, (Dkt. No. 202), which asks the Court to resolve the following discovery issue: 16 Whether ADT should be permitted, outside of the constraints of ordinary merits discovery, to depose former ADT customers and defendant Claudio Hand concerning alleged violations of the terms of the Court’s January 3, 2013, order barring the use of false claims of affiliation with alarm system manufacturers GE and Honeywell. 17 The Court understands that “Security One has agreed to depositions concerning complaints 15 18 that ADT first became aware of on or after March 15.” Accordingly, the Court will address only 19 those depositions to which Security One has not agreed—depositions concerning complaints that 20 ADT first became aware of before March 15, 2013. 21 22 23 24 ADT has not made a sufficiently persuasive showing that Defendants have violated the terms of the Court’s January 3, 2013 Order so as to justify ordering the requested discovery. Without further order of the Court, the use of any agreed to depositions shall be limited to proving violations of the injunction. 25 This Order Terminates Docket Number 202. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Date: April 9, 2013 _____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?