ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al

Filing 94

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES' LETTER BRIEF CONCERNING DISCOVERY DISPUTES re 84 Joint Discovery Letter Brief Concerning Discovery Disputes filed by ADT Security Services, Inc. The Administrative Motion to file Under Seal, Dkt. No. 88 is DENIED.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/11/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

2
3

ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
4

Plaintiff,
5

Case No.: 11-CV-05149 YGR
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ LETTER BRIEF
CONCERNING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

vs.
6

SECURITY ONE INT’L, INC. et al.,
7

Defendants.
8
9
10
11

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Letter Brief Concerning Discovery Disputes, Dkt. No. 84,
and ORDERS as follows:
1)

Security One is entitled to discovery that is relevant to its unclean hands defense.


13

One may take in relation to its unclean hands defense is DENIED.

14
15

2)

20
21
22
23
24

ADT’s proposed cross-referencing procedure is a reasonable procedure to address
Security One’s privacy and confidentiality concerns.

17

19

Security One must produce its customer list.


16

18

ADT’s request for a protective order to define the scope of discovery that Security

3)

The Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, Dkt. No. 88, is DENIED.

4)

The Court will not take any further action with respect to the parties’ Letter Brief

Concerning Discovery Disputes, Dkt. No. 84. With the understanding of the Court’s position
on the issues addressed in this Order, the parties shall meet and confer to resolve any
remaining discovery issues.
5)

The Court will not issue sanctions at this time.

6)

This Order Terminates Docket Numbers 84 & 88.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
25

Date: June 11, 2012
26
27
28

_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE