ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al
Filing
97
MODIFIED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR CLAUDIO HAND TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS; AND CONTINUING MOTION HEARING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/21/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.,
Case No. C 11-05149-YGR
Plaintiff,
vs.
SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
CLAUDIO HAND, SCELLUSALEADS and
PURE CLAR,
[PROPOSED] MODIFIED ORDER EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR CLAUDIO HAND TO FILE A
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO
DISMISS; AND CONTINUING MOTION HEARING
Defendants.
11
12
After considering the Stipulation submitted by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
13
the deadline for Claudio Hand to file a Reply in Support of his Motion to Dismiss the Second
14
Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) is hereby extended to June 29, 2012. The Court’s
15
Standing Order in Civil Cases advises that “requests which, in effect do not allow the Court two
16
weeks from the filing of the last brief until the scheduled hearing date are denied routinely.”
17
See Standing Order in Civil Cases ¶ 3 (emphasis in original). There is good cause for the
18
requested extension of time, but the parties’ request shortens the time for the Court to consider the
19
motion. Accordingly, the hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to July 24, 2012.
20
21
If the parties are unavailable on July 24, 2012, the parties shall advise the Court and list
the upcoming Civil Law and Motion dates on which the parties are available.
22
This Order Terminates Docket Number 96.
23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
June 21,2012
DATED: ___________
_____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-5149-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?