ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Security One International, Inc. et al

Filing 97

MODIFIED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR CLAUDIO HAND TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS; AND CONTINUING MOTION HEARING. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/21/12. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Case No. C 11-05149-YGR Plaintiff, vs. SECURITY ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC., CLAUDIO HAND, SCELLUSALEADS and PURE CLAR, [PROPOSED] MODIFIED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR CLAUDIO HAND TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO DISMISS; AND CONTINUING MOTION HEARING Defendants. 11 12 After considering the Stipulation submitted by the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 13 the deadline for Claudio Hand to file a Reply in Support of his Motion to Dismiss the Second 14 Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) is hereby extended to June 29, 2012. The Court’s 15 Standing Order in Civil Cases advises that “requests which, in effect do not allow the Court two 16 weeks from the filing of the last brief until the scheduled hearing date are denied routinely.” 17 See Standing Order in Civil Cases ¶ 3 (emphasis in original). There is good cause for the 18 requested extension of time, but the parties’ request shortens the time for the Court to consider the 19 motion. Accordingly, the hearing date on the Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to July 24, 2012. 20 21 If the parties are unavailable on July 24, 2012, the parties shall advise the Court and list the upcoming Civil Law and Motion dates on which the parties are available. 22 This Order Terminates Docket Number 96. 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 June 21,2012 DATED: ___________ _____________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 27 28 CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-5149-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?