Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT re 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 41 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings, 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment Stipulated Request t filed by Electronic Frontier Foundation, Department of Justice, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 41 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings, 40 MOTION for Summary Judgment Stipulated Request t, 40 MOTI ON for Summary Judgment , 41 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 3/12/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/31/2013. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 vs. Case No.: 11-cv-5221-YGR ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE HEARING ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 The Court is in receipt of the parties’ Stipulated Request to Reschedule Hearing on Cross- 14 Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt No. 46.) Taking into account counsel’s and the Court’s 15 availability, the Court RESETS the hearing date to March 12, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: January 31, 2013 ___________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?