Crane v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
27
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S 12 MOTION TO REMAND. Case Management Statement due by 1/19/2012. Case Management Conference set for 1/26/2012 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 12/20/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
LIVIA CRANE,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C 11-05294 CW
ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
TO REMAND
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and DOES
1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
________________________________/
16
17
Plaintiff has moved to remand this action to Santa Cruz
18
County Superior Court.
19
2011, the parties submitted a joint case management statement, in
20
which Plaintiff appears to concede that the "citizenship of the
21
parties is entirely diverse."
22
1:25.
23
to remand.1
24
motion to remand is vacated and the case management conference is
Docket No. 12.
However, on December 16,
Joint Case Management Statement at
The case management statement does not mention the motion
Accordingly, the December 22, 2011 hearing on the
25
26
27
28
1
The Court also notes that the case management statement
does not mention the ADR telephone conference that is currently
scheduled for December 20, 2011 at 11:00 am. The parties are
ordered to participate in this conference.
1
reset for January 26, 2012 at 2:00 pm, to be heard along with
2
Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss and motion to strike.
3
Plaintiff may submit a consolidated opposition, not to exceed
4
twenty-five pages, to Wells Fargo's motion to dismiss and motion
5
to strike.
6
exceed fifteen pages.
7
Wells Fargo may submit a single reply brief not to
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated: 12/20/2011
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?