Crane v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 31

ORDER DIMISSING PLAINTIFF'S ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/3/2012. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

LIVIA CRANE,

7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

No. C 11-05294 CW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIMISSING
PLAINTIFF'S ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and DOES
1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
________________________________/

12
13

On December 14, 2011, Defendant Wells Fargo filed an amended

14

motion to dismiss all eight claims in Plaintiff's complaint, as

15

well as a motion to strike portions of the complaint.

16

23 and 25.

17

December 28, 2011, as required under Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), the

18

Court warned Plaintiff that failure to do so on or before January

19

30, 2012 would result in dismissal of the action for failure to

20

prosecute.

21

the Court's order.

22

prejudice for failure to prosecute.

23

Docket Nos.

After Plaintiff failed to respond to the motions by

Docket No. 30.

Plaintiff has failed to comply with

Therefore, the action is dismissed without

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

2/3/2012

CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge