Anderson v. Hammer et al
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/19/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
EDWARD ANDERSON,
Case No: C 11-5300 SBA
6
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
7
vs.
8
DERROL HAMMER, EILEEN NASTO,
9 LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL
LAB, NEIL LOPEZ,
10
Defendants.
11
12
13
The Court previously dismissed the action with leave to amend. Dkt. 11. Plaintiff
14
was given until January 11, 2012 to file an amended complaint and to pay the $350 filing
15
fee. The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to amend his complaint in a timely manner
16
which addresses the deficiencies noted by the Court and/or to pay the filing fee would
17
result in the dismissal of the action. To date, Plaintiff has complied with neither
18
requirement. Accordingly,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED without
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 19, 2012
_______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ANDERSON et al,
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
v.
HAMMER et al,
Defendant.
/
12
13
Case Number: CV11-05300 SBA
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
15
16
17
18
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 20, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
19
20
22
Edward Anderson
16094 Gramercy Drive
Berkeley, CA 94578
23
Dated: January 20, 2012
21
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
24
By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?