Anderson v. Hammer et al

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 1/19/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 EDWARD ANDERSON, Case No: C 11-5300 SBA 6 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 7 vs. 8 DERROL HAMMER, EILEEN NASTO, 9 LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LAB, NEIL LOPEZ, 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 The Court previously dismissed the action with leave to amend. Dkt. 11. Plaintiff 14 was given until January 11, 2012 to file an amended complaint and to pay the $350 filing 15 fee. The Court warned Plaintiff that the failure to amend his complaint in a timely manner 16 which addresses the deficiencies noted by the Court and/or to pay the filing fee would 17 result in the dismissal of the action. To date, Plaintiff has complied with neither 18 requirement. Accordingly, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2012 _______________________________ SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ANDERSON et al, 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff, v. HAMMER et al, Defendant. / 12 13 Case Number: CV11-05300 SBA 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 15 16 17 18 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on January 20, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 19 20 22 Edward Anderson 16094 Gramercy Drive Berkeley, CA 94578 23 Dated: January 20, 2012 21 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk 24 By: LISA R CLARK, Deputy Clerk 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?