Sonics, Inc. v. Arteris, Inc.
Filing
53
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BRYAN WILSON (CA SBN 138842)
BWilson@mofo.com
KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS (CA
SBN 197486)
KVanVoorhis@mofo.com
CHRISTOPHER F. JEU (CA SBN 247865)
CJeu@mofo.com
ZAHRA HAYAT (CA SBN 262605)
ZHayat@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
Telephone: 650.813.5600
Facsimile: 650.494.0792
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SONICS, INC.
10
MARK D. FOWLER (BAR NO. 124235)
Mark.fowler@dlapiper.com
CHANG KIM (Bar No. 273393)
Changu.kim@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215
Tel: (650)833-2000
Fax: (650)833-2001
GERALD T. SEKIMURA (BAR NO. 96165)
Gerald.sekimura@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: (415)836-2500
Fax: (415)836-2501
KEVIN C. HAMILTON
kevin.hamilton@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: (619)699-2700
Fax: (619)699-2701
11
12
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant
ARTERIS, INC.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
OAKLAND DIVISION
19
20
SONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
Case No.
4:11-cv-05311 SBA (LB)
] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
v.
ARTERIS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.
25
26
27
28
[PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB)
pa-1541527
1
1
Pursuant to the Court’s instruction at the telephonic Joint Case Management Conference
2
for the above-captioned case held on July 12, 2012, Plaintiff Sonics, Inc. (“Sonics”) and
3
Defendant Arteris, Inc. (“Arteris”) submit this Proposed Order Re Schedule For Claim
4
Construction.
5
6
Event
Date
7
Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions
July 30, 2012
8
Joint Claim Construction Pre-Hearing Statement
August 9, 2012
9
Claim Construction Opening Brief
September 3, 2012
10
Claim Construction Responsive Brief
September 17, 2012
11
Claim Construction Reply Brief
September 24, 2012
12
Claim Construction Hearing
January 9, 2013 at 10:00AM (estimated
13
duration: 2 - 4 hours)
14
15
Dated: July 13, 2012
16
By: /s/ Chang Kim
Mark D. Fowler
Gerald T. Sekimura
Kevin C. Hamilton
Chang Kim
Attorneys for Defendant
ARTERIS, INC.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
Dated: July 13, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By: /s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
Bryan Wilson
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
Christopher F. Jeu
Zahra Hayat
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SONICS, INC.
25
26
27
28
[PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB)
pa-1541527
2
1
Attestation of Concurrence
2
I, KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that
3
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from CHANG KIM .
4
Dated: July 13, 2012
5
By:_/s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis___
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB)
pa-1541527
3
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
2
The Parties’ Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction is hereby GRANTED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
7
8
Dated: ___7/17/12_________________
HON. SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB)
pa-1541527
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?