Sonics, Inc. v. Arteris, Inc.

Filing 53

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 7/17/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BRYAN WILSON (CA SBN 138842) BWilson@mofo.com KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS (CA SBN 197486) KVanVoorhis@mofo.com CHRISTOPHER F. JEU (CA SBN 247865) CJeu@mofo.com ZAHRA HAYAT (CA SBN 262605) ZHayat@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: 650.813.5600 Facsimile: 650.494.0792 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff SONICS, INC. 10 MARK D. FOWLER (BAR NO. 124235) Mark.fowler@dlapiper.com CHANG KIM (Bar No. 273393) Changu.kim@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215 Tel: (650)833-2000 Fax: (650)833-2001 GERALD T. SEKIMURA (BAR NO. 96165) Gerald.sekimura@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 555 Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415)836-2500 Fax: (415)836-2501 KEVIN C. HAMILTON kevin.hamilton@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: (619)699-2700 Fax: (619)699-2701 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant ARTERIS, INC. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 OAKLAND DIVISION 19 20 SONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 Case No. 4:11-cv-05311 SBA (LB) ] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION v. ARTERIS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB) pa-1541527 1 1 Pursuant to the Court’s instruction at the telephonic Joint Case Management Conference 2 for the above-captioned case held on July 12, 2012, Plaintiff Sonics, Inc. (“Sonics”) and 3 Defendant Arteris, Inc. (“Arteris”) submit this Proposed Order Re Schedule For Claim 4 Construction. 5 6 Event Date 7 Parties to Exchange Proposed Constructions July 30, 2012 8 Joint Claim Construction Pre-Hearing Statement August 9, 2012 9 Claim Construction Opening Brief September 3, 2012 10 Claim Construction Responsive Brief September 17, 2012 11 Claim Construction Reply Brief September 24, 2012 12 Claim Construction Hearing January 9, 2013 at 10:00AM (estimated 13 duration: 2 - 4 hours) 14 15 Dated: July 13, 2012 16 By: /s/ Chang Kim Mark D. Fowler Gerald T. Sekimura Kevin C. Hamilton Chang Kim Attorneys for Defendant ARTERIS, INC. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DLA PIPER LLP (US) Dated: July 13, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis Bryan Wilson Kimberly N. Van Voorhis Christopher F. Jeu Zahra Hayat Attorneys for Plaintiff SONICS, INC. 25 26 27 28 [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB) pa-1541527 2 1 Attestation of Concurrence 2 I, KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from CHANG KIM . 4 Dated: July 13, 2012 5 By:_/s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis___ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB) pa-1541527 3 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 2 The Parties’ Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction is hereby GRANTED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: ___7/17/12_________________ HON. SAUNDRA B. ARMSTRONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311-SBA (LB) pa-1541527 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?