Sonics, Inc. v. Arteris, Inc.

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 61 Claim Construction Statement filed by Arteris, Inc.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 9/21/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

BRYAN WILSON (CA SBN 138842)
[e-mail]
KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS (CA SBN 197486)
[e-mail]
CHRISTOPHER F. JEU (CA SBN 247865)
[e-mail]
ZAHRA HAYAT (CA SBN 262605)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.494.0792
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SONICS, INC.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14

SONICS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19

v.

Case No.

4:11-cv-05311 SBA-(LB)

STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULING OF
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY
BRIEF

ARTERIS, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:

N.A.
N.A.
1 - 4th Floor
Saundra Brown Armstrong

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO.: 4:11-CV-05311 SBA-(LB)
pa-1552437

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Plaintiff Sonics, Inc. (“Sonics”) and Defendant Arteris, Inc. (“Arteris”) (collectively, the
“Parties”) hereby stipulate and respectfully request as follows:
WHEREAS, on July 18, 2012, this Court entered an Order Re Schedule for Claim
Construction (“Scheduling Order”).
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Sonics filed its Claim Construction
Opening Brief on September 4, 2012 (September 3, 2012 was a Court holiday).
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Arteris filed its Claim Construction
Responsive Brief on September 17, 2012.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, Sonics’ Claim Construction Reply Brief
(“Reply Brief”) is currently due on September 24, 2012.
WHEREAS, due to an unexpected personal emergency, Sonics will be unable to file a
Reply Brief on September 24, 2012.
WHEREAS, in view of this emergency, the Parties have stipulated to an extension of the
deadline to file a Reply Brief by one week, to October 1, 2012.
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that an extension will not affect the schedule for the
Claim Construction Hearing, which is set for January 9, 2012.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the

19

deadline for Sonics’ Claim Construction Reply Brief be extended from September 24, 2012 to

20

October 1, 2012.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO.: 4:11-CV-05311 SBA-(LB)
pa-1552437

1

1
2

Dated: September 20, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3
By: /s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS

4
5

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SONICS, INC.

6
7

Dated: September 20, 2012

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

8
9

By:

10

/s/ Chang Kim
CHANG KIM
Attorneys for Defendant
ARTERIS, INC.

11
12
13
14

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

15

I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the electronic filing

16

of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

17
18

Dated: September 20, 2012

/s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCT REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311 SBA-(LB)
pa-1552437

2

1
2

ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING SCHEDULING OF CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF

3
4
5

The Parties’ request is hereby granted, and the deadline for Sonics’ Claim Construction
Reply Brief is extended to October 1, 2012.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9
10
11

Dated: _9/21/12

_________________________________
Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong
Judge, United States District Court

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER RE SCHEDULING OF CLAIM CONSTRUCT REPLY BRIEF
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-05311 SBA-(LB)
pa-1552437

3