Abels v. GE Homeland Protection Inc et al

Filing 88

STIPULATION AND ORDER; ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. re 87 Stipulation filed by Morpho Detection, Inc, Alison M. Abels, Matrix Absence Management, Inc., Karim Bousta. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 10/28/2014. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2014)

onne Go
Judge Yv

ER

11

nzalez R

10/28/14

H

10

Attorneys for Defendants
MORPHO DETECTION, INC., KARIM BOUSTA, and
MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT, INC.

RT

9

NO

8

N

R NIA

7

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

o ge r s

FO

6

LI

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

4

MELINDA S. RIECHERT (State Bar No. 065504)
KATHRYN M. NAZARIAN (State Bar No. 259392)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

A

3

S

2

ALISON M. ABELS, In Pro Per
3198 Log Cabin Court
Placerville, CA 95667
[phone]
[e-mail]

UNIT
ED

1

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
OAKLAND DIVISION
14
15

Plaintiffs,

16

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

vs.

17
18

4
Case No. 3:11-CV-05313-YGR
i

ALISON M. ABELS,

GE HOMELAND PROTECTION INC., et al.,
Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO

28
DB2/ 25383912.1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:11-cv-05313-YGR

JOINT STIPULATION

1
2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action, Plaintiff Alison

3

M. Abels (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Morpho Detection, Inc. (“MDI”), Karim Bousta, and

4

Matrix Absence Management, Inc. (“Matrix”) (the “Parties”), through their designated counsel

5

that the above-captioned action, including all claims and counterclaims, be and hereby is

6

voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of

7

Civil Procedure.

8
9
10

The Parties shall bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs of suit incurred in
connection with this Action and its dismissal.
All parties that have appeared in this action have consented and agreed to the dismissal

11

with prejudice pursuant to this Stipulation, and accordingly this dismissal is effective “without a

12

court order” pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated:October 27, 2014

ALISON M. ABELS, In Pro Per

15
By /s/ Alison M. Abels
Alison M. Abels

16
17

Dated: October 27, 2014

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

18
19

By /s/ Kathryn M. Nazarian
Kathryn M. Nazarian
Attorneys for Defendants
MORPHO DETECTION, INC., KARIM
BOUSTA, AND MATRIX ABSENCE
MANAGEMENT, INC.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

1

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO

28
DB2/ 24763136.1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:11-cv-05313-YGR

FILER’S ATTESTATION
1

I, Kathryn M. Nazarian, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being

2

used to file pro per Plaintiff Alison M. Abels and Defendants Morpho Detection, Inc., Karim

3

Bousta, and Matrix Absence Management, Inc.’s Stipulation for Dismissal of Action With

4

Prejudice. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Alison M. Abels concurs in

5

this filing.

6

/s/ Kathryn M. Nazarian
Kathryn M. Nazarian
Attorneys for Defendants
MORPHO DETECTION, INC., KARIM BOUSTA, and
MATRIX ABSENCE MANAGEMENT, INC.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

2

M ORGAN , L EWIS &
B OCKIUS LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN FRA NCI SCO

28
DB2/ 24763136.1

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. 3:11-cv-05313-YGR