MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Filing
466
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 2 RE: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 28, 2014. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/25/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
7
MEDIATEK, INC.,
8
PLAINTIFF,
CASE NO.: 11-CV-5341 YGR
PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 2 RE: PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 28, 2014
9
VS.
10
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
11
DEFENDANT.
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
The parties are scheduled to appear for a further pretrial conference on Friday, February 28,
13
2014, at 9:00 a.m. In addition to those issues and tasks discussed during the first pretrial conference,
14
the parties should be prepared to address the following specific issues:
15
1. The Court has issued its Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Motion of Plaintiff
16
MediaTek, Inc., to Strike Improper Expert Opinions of Dr. Frank Vahid (Dkt. No. 454). The parties
17
are directed to be prepared to address the impact of that order on the pending motion of MediaTek
18
for Summary Judgment on the grounds that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,738,845 (“the
19
’845 patent”) are not invalid for obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). (Dkt. No. 298.)
20
2. The Court will entertain argument on:
21
22
23
24
MediaTek’s Motion to Strike, or In the Alternative Preclude Under Daubert Opinions of Dr.
Frank Vahid (Dkt. No. 299-5); and Freescale’s Motion Exclude Certain Testimony of Catherine M.
Lawton (Dkt. No. 302-4.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
DATED: FEBRUARY 25, 2014
26
______________________________________
27
HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?