MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 550

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 393 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

OAKLAND DIVISION

5

MEDIATEK INC.
Plaintiff,

6
7
8

Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-05341 (YGR)

v.
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Defendant.

9

ORDER GRANTING MEDIATEK
INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
(Dkt. No. 393)
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4:11-cv-05341 (YGR)

ORDER GRANTING MEDIATEK’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1
2
3

Upon consideration of MediaTek, Inc.’s (“MediaTek’s”) Administrative Motion for
Leave to File Documents Under Seal (“Motion to File Under Seal”), the Declaration of
Christopher A. Franklin in Support of MediaTek’s Motion to File Under Seal and other

4
supporting documents, this Court hereby GRANTS MediaTek’s Motion to File Under Seal:
5
6

MediaTek shall file under seal the confidential, unredacted portions of the following documents:

7

Document

Portion Sought to Be Sealed

Ruling

8

MediaTek Inc.’s Notice of
Motions in Limine Nos. 111
MediaTek Inc.’s Motions in
Limine Nos. 1-11
Declaration of Brett
Hammon
Exhibit 4 to Declaration of
Brett Hammon
Exhibit 5 to Declaration of
Brett Hammon
Exhibit 7 to Declaration of
Brett Hammon
Exhibit 8 to Declaration of
Brett Hammon
Exhibit 9 to Declaration of
Brett Hammon
Exhibit 11 to Declaration of
Brett Hammon

p. 2

Grant

p. i, 5, 14-15, 16, 17, 19, 21, 22,
29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37
p. 1

Grant
Grant

Entire document

Grant

ps. 136-138, 142-143, 199, 206:116, 206:21-207:12
Entire document

Grant
Grant

Entire document

Grant

Entire document

Grant

p. 61

Grant

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

These documents were submitted in connection with MediaTek’s Motions In Limine
Sealing in connection with those motions is proper based on MediaTek’s showing of good cause.

21

The documents are therefore ORDERED SEALED for purposes of consideration of the

22

motions in connection with which they were submitted only. Should any party wish to seal

23

portions of the documents in connection with any later motion or trial, they will need to make a

24

sufficient showing at that time. This Order terminates Docket No. 393.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 20, 2014
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE