MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 566

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 546 Motion to Intervene (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 OAKLAND DIVISION 6 MEDIATEK INC., 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 Case No. 4:11-cv-05341 (YGR) (JSC) ORDER DENYING THIRD PARTY PANASONIC CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE (DKT. NO. 546) v. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 10 Defendant. 11 12 On June 16, 2014, third party Panasonic Corporation, formerly known as Matsushita 13 Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., (“Panasonic”) submitted a Motion for Leave to Intervene for Limited 14 Purpose of Sealing Portions of License Agreements, as well as a Joint Stipulation to Third Party 15 Panasonic Corporation’s Motion for Leave to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Sealing Portions 16 of License Agreements. (Dkt. No. 546.) 17 The motion is DENIED AS MOOT and unnecessary. Third party Panasonic previously 18 submitted its declaration in support of sealing additional portions of documents 496-8, 496-9, 19 496-10, 496-11 and 496-13 on May 5, 2014. (See Dkt. No. 540-1 through 540-9.) The Court has 20 considered these documents in reaching its order on MediaTek’s Motion to Seal the documents 21 and has granted the request to seal these portions of the documents, by separate order filed 22 concurrently. 23 The hearing previously set for July 22, 2014 is VACATED. 24 This terminates Dkt. No. 546. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: June 20, , 2014 27 YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 28 -1- ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE CASE NO: 4:11-CV-05341 (YGR) (JSC)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?