MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Filing
566
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 546 Motion to Intervene (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
OAKLAND DIVISION
6
MEDIATEK INC.,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
Case No. 4:11-cv-05341 (YGR) (JSC)
ORDER DENYING THIRD
PARTY PANASONIC
CORPORATION’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
(DKT. NO. 546)
v.
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
10
Defendant.
11
12
On June 16, 2014, third party Panasonic Corporation, formerly known as Matsushita
13
Electric Industrial Co. Ltd., (“Panasonic”) submitted a Motion for Leave to Intervene for Limited
14
Purpose of Sealing Portions of License Agreements, as well as a Joint Stipulation to Third Party
15
Panasonic Corporation’s Motion for Leave to Intervene for Limited Purpose of Sealing Portions
16
of License Agreements. (Dkt. No. 546.)
17
The motion is DENIED AS MOOT and unnecessary. Third party Panasonic previously
18
submitted its declaration in support of sealing additional portions of documents 496-8, 496-9,
19
496-10, 496-11 and 496-13 on May 5, 2014. (See Dkt. No. 540-1 through 540-9.) The Court has
20
considered these documents in reaching its order on MediaTek’s Motion to Seal the documents
21
and has granted the request to seal these portions of the documents, by separate order filed
22
concurrently.
23
The hearing previously set for July 22, 2014 is VACATED.
24
This terminates Dkt. No. 546.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated:
June 20,
, 2014
27
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
28
-1-
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
CASE NO: 4:11-CV-05341 (YGR) (JSC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?