MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 578

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY EXCERPTS. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/7/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2014)

1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION

3
4
5

MEDIATEK INC.

6

Plaintiff,

7
8

Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-05341 (YGR)

v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
DISCOVERY EXCERPTS
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

9

Defendant.

10
Upon consideration of plaintiff MediaTek Inc. (MediaTek) and defendant

11
12

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.’s (Freescale) Revised Joint List of Discovery Excerpts,

13

this Court rules as follows:

14

MEDIATEK’S LIST OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

15

Exhibit 3 – Noam Efrati (June 27, 2013)

16
No.

MediaTek
Designations

17
18

P.136

111:11112:11;
112:14-24;
113:2-8

P.145

Freescale
Objections

138:11-18;
138:20-139:1;
139:4-7

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

Freescale
Counter
Designations
216:13-19; 216:25217:12; (214:8-216:8
also counterdesignated to support
“all four of those
potential scenarios”)
(counter for 112:1624; 113:2-3)
216:13-19; 216:25217:12; (214:8-216:8
also counterdesignated to support
“all four of those
potential scenarios”)
(counter for 138:20139:1)

MediaTek
Objections
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; FRE
403; Leading; Hearsay

Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; FRE
403; Leading; Hearsay

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

COURT’S RULINGS:

1
2
3
4

P.136,
P.145
P.136,
P.145
P.136,
P.145

216:13-19

Overruled

216:25-217:12

Overruled

214:8-216:8

Overruled

5
6
7
8

Exhibit 6 – David Orris (June 26, 2013)
No.

MediaTek
Designations

9
10

P.302

21:17-22:24

P.308

29:24-30:1;
30:3

Freescale
Objections

11
12

Freescale
Counter
Designations
30:15; 30:18-19;
30:22-23; 30:25; 31:34; 31:8-9; 31:12;
148:15-22

13
14

Foundation

15
16
17
18

P.308

19
20
21
22

P.302,
P.308

23
24

P.302,
P.308

25
26
27
28

P.302,
P.308

30:15; 30:18-19;
30:22-23; 30:25; 31:34; 31:8-9; 31:12;
148:15-22

MediaTek
Objections
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; vague;
ambiguous; relevance;
prejudice; hearsay
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; vague;
ambiguous; relevance;
prejudice; hearsay

COURT’S RULINGS:
29:24-30:1; 30:3
This objection was not previously made and
Page 29 has not been provided to the Court.
See Dkt. 517-1. Therefore, it is tentatively
denied. MediaTek shall provide evidence of
foundation by Wednesday, July 9, 2014 with
Page 29.
30:15
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
30:18-19
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
30:22-23
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
1

CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

1

No.

MediaTek
Designations

2

Freescale
Objections

3
4

P.302,
P.308

30:25

P.302,
P.308

31:3-4

P.302,
P.308

31:8-9

P.302,
P.308

31:12

P.302,
P.308

148:15-22

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Freescale
MediaTek
Counter
Objections
Designations
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.

15
16
17

Exhibit 8 – Changhae Park (September 30, 2013)
No.

MediaTek
Designations

18
19

P.346

62:25-63:13

FRE 401/402; FRE
403

P.347

64:10-14

FRE 401/402; FRE
403

P.348

77:6-18;
77:21-23;
77:25-78:6

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Freescale
Counter
Designations
64:15-18; 65:2-66:4;
67:2-11; 67:25-68:4;
68:7-17; 94:7-11;
64:15-18; 65:2-66:4;
67:2-11; 67:25-68:4;
68:7-17; 94:7-11;

MediaTek
Objections

Incomplete
hypothetical
(objection to 77:1518; 77:22-23; 78:45); FRE 401/402;
FRE 403; FRE 701
(objection to 77:1518; 77:21-23; 77:2578:6)

20
21

Freescale
Objections

2
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

FRE 401/402; FRE
403
FRE 401/402; FRE
403
FRE 401/402; FRE
403

1

P.351

80:19-21

2

P.353

87:7-17

3

P.354

99:3-11

P.355

99:15-100:11

P.356

111:15-113:6

4
5
6
7
8

P.346

FRE 401/402; FRE
403

99:12-14; 100:19-24;
101:9-15; 101:17-20;
101:23-102:6; 102:17103:11; 103:18-221
100:19-24; 101:17-20;
101:23-102:6; 102:17103:11; 103:18-22
113:7-8

FRE 401/402; FRE
403
COURT’S RULINGS:
62:25-63:13

9

Overruled
P.347

64:10-14

11

P.348

77:15-18

12

P.348

77:21-23

13

P.348

77:25-78:6

P.351

80:19-21

P.353

87:7-17

10

14
15
16
17

99:3-11

P.355

99:15-100:11

Reserve. The Court requires the referenced
Exhibit 6 to be provided to the Court no later
than July 9, 2014.

P.356

111:15-113:6

Reserve. The Court requires the referenced
Exhibit 6 to be provided to the Court no later
than July 9, 2014.

20
21

Sustained
Reserve. The Court requires the referenced
Exhibit 6 to be provided to the Court no later
than July 9, 2014.

P.354

18
19

Overruled
Overruled on all grounds but reserve on FRE
701 objection.
Overruled on all grounds but reserve on FRE
701 objection.
Overruled on all grounds but reserve on FRE
701 objection.
Overruled on all grounds but reserve on FRE
701 objection.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
For those counter designations in italic typeface, the parties agree that those counter designations are to be
counted against the counter designating party’s trial time

3
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

Exhibit 9 – Andrew Percy (June 7, 2013)

1
2

No.

MediaTek
Designations

3
4

Freescale
Objections

Freescale
Counter
Designations
28:22-29:4; 33:6-8;
35:1-11; 41:9-42:5;
66:9-22

P.369

28:22-30:8

P.370

31:11-17

28:22-29:4; 33:6-8;
35:1-11; 41:9-42:5;
47:5-7; 47:9; 47:11-14;
66:9-22

P.372

32:8-13

28:22-29:4; 33:6-8;
35:1-11; 41:9-42:5;
66:9-22

P.373

32:18-20; 32:2333:5

28:22-29:4; 33:6-8;
35:1-11; 41:9-42:5;
66:9-22

P.382

41:23-42:14

28:22-29:4; 33:6-8;
35:1-11; 41:9-42:5;
66:9-22

P.386

52:17-19

28:22-29:4; 33:6-8;
35:1-11; 41:9-42:5;
66:9-22

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

MediaTek
Objections
(35:1-11, 41:9-42:5,
66:9-22) Beyond the
scope of designation,
not needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403
(35:1-11, 41:9-42:5,
47:5-7, 47:9, 47:1114, 66:9-22) Beyond
the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403
(35:1-11, 41:9-42:5,
66:9-22) Beyond the
scope of designation,
not needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403
(35:1-11, 41:9-42:5,
66:9-22) Beyond the
scope of designation,
not needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403
(33:6-8, 35:1-11,
66:9-22) Beyond the
scope of designation,
not needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403
(33:6-8, 35:1-11,
41:9-42:5, 66:9-22)
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403

27
28

4
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

COURT’S RULINGS:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

P.382,
P.386
P.369,
P.370,
P.372,
P.373,
P.382,
P.386
P.369,
P.370,
P.372,
P.373,
P.386
P.370

33:6-8

Overruled

35:1-11

Overruled

41:9-42:5

Overruled

47:5-7

Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.

10
11

P.370

47:9

P.370

47:11-14

P.369,
P.370,
P.372,
P.373,
P.386
P.378

66:9-22

37:8-12

58:12-59:7; 59:19-23;
60:10-61:11

P.387

54:22-56:2

58:12-59:7; 59:19-23;
60:10-61:11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Sustained

20
21
22
23
24
25

Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness; FRE
401/402; FRE 403

26
27
28

5
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

1
2

P.378,
P.387

58:12-59:7

P.378,
P.387

59:19-23

Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.

P.378,
P.387

60:10-61:11

Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.

3
4
5

COURT’S RULINGS:
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore
can be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Exhibit 11 – Allen Wagner (June 28, 2013)

13

15

P.471

MediaTek
Designations
57:1-58:2

P.537

127:6-128:10

149:5-150:2 (counter
for 128:5-10)

P.539

129:16-130:8;
130:10

149:5-150:2 (counter
for 129:25-130:8;
130:10)

P.540

14

No.

Freescale
Objections

Freescale
Counter Designations
58:3-4; 58:7 (counter
for 57:17-58:2)

130:11-13;
130:16

149:5-150:2

P.541

130:17-20;
130:23-24

149:5-150:2

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MediaTek
Objections
Relevance; Beyond
the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness;
speculative; FRE 403
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness

6
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

P.542

130:25-131:2;
131:5

149:5-150:2

P.543

131:6-7;
131:10-12

149:5-150:2

P.545

133:10-134:1

149:5-150:2

P.553

147:5-22;
147:25

149:5-150:2

P.554

148:1-5

149:5-150:2

P.562

163:10-164:3
164:6

149:5-150:2

P.563

164:7-10;
164:13

149:5-150:2

P.564

164:14-16;
164:19

149:5-150:2

P.565

1

164:20-21;
164:24;
165:1-2

149:5-150:2

P.567

165:3-5;
165:8-9

149:5-150:2

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness

24
25
26
27
28

7
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

COURT’S RULINGS:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

P.471
P.537,
P.539543,
P.545,
P.553,
P.554,
P.562565,
P.567

58:3-4; 58:7
149:5-150:2

Overruled
Sustained

8
9
Exhibit 12 – Glen Wienecke (June 27, 2013)
10
11
12
13
14

No.

MediaTek
Designations
P.659
35:10-18;
35:22-36:25

Freescale
Objections
Scope of Case
(objection to
35:16-18; 35:2224)

Freescale
Counter Designations

P.665

44:4-14;
44:16-17

46:1-11; 167:18-168:23

P.667

44:24-25;
45:2-14

45:15-46:11; 167:18168:23

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

MediaTek
Objections

(46:1-11) Beyond the
scope of designation,
not needed for
completeness;
Speculative; Improper
expert opinion;
(167:18-168:23)
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness
(45:15-46:11) Beyond
the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness;
Speculative; Improper
expert opinion;
(167:18-168:23)
Beyond the scope of
designation, not
needed for
completeness

27
28

8
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

1
P.659

COURT’S RULINGS:
35:16-18; 35:22-24

Overruled

2
3
4

P.665

46:1-11

Sustained

P.667

45:15-46:11

Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
overruled on all other grounds and therefore can
be used by Freescale separately in its own
presentation of evidence.

P.665,
P.667

167:18-168:23

Overruled

5
6
7
8
9

FREESCALE’S LIST OF DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

10

Exhibit 14 – Kenneth Obuszewski (June 25, 2013)

11
12

No.

13

Freescale
Designations
42:6-43:1;
43:13-14;
43:21-23

D15

14
15
16
17
18

D16
D17
D15

MediaTek
MediaTek
Freescale
Objections
Counter Designations
Objections
(42:6-43:1)
37:3-10; 37:16-38:13;
Hearsay (43:13-14; 39:10-12; 39:21-24;
43:21-23) Hearsay, 40:6-41:1; 41:7-9
relevance, unfair
prejudice, FRE
106
65:23-66:6
Hearsay
67:23-68:22
Hearsay
COURT’S RULINGS:
42:6-43:1
Overruled

19
D15

43:13-14

Overruled

21

D15

43:21-23

Overruled

22

D16

65:23-66:6

Overruled

23

D17

67:23-68:22

Overruled

20

24
25
26
27
28

9
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS

Exhibit 15 – M. H. Shieh (August 1 & 2, 2013)

1
2
3

No.

Freescale
Designations
19:1-10;
19:22-20:6

D21

4
5
6
7

D21

MediaTek
Objections

MediaTek
Freescale
Counter Designations
Objections
(counters for 19:1-10;
FRE 401/402; FRE
19:22-20:6) 43:24-25;
403; Order (Dkt. No.
44:6-7;
443); Outside the
(counter for 19:22-20:6) scope (all objections
20:16-22
to 43:24-25; 44:6-7)
COURT’S RULINGS:
43:24-25; 44:6-7
Sustained as to the objection regarding scope;
otherwise reserve.

8
9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 7, 2014.

12
13

____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

10
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-05341-YGR

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISCOVERY EXCERPTS