MediaTek Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Filing
658
ORDER RULING ON OBJECTIONS TO SLIDES OFFERED AS DEMONSTRATIVES IN CONNECTION WITH FREESCALES EXPERTS TESTIMONY Signed by Judge YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS on 9/10/2014. (ygrlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
Case No.: 11-cv-5341 YGR
MEDIATEK INC.,
7
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER RULING ON OBJECTIONS TO SLIDES
OFFERED AS DEMONSTRATIVES IN
CONNECTION WITH FREESCALE’S EXPERT’S
TESTIMONY
vs.
9
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
10
Defendant.
11
Northern District of California
United States District Court
12
13
The Court ORDERS as follows on MediaTek’s objections to Freescale’s demonstrative slides
to be used in connection with the testimony of Dr. Frank Vahid:
14
15
16
17
Slide/DDX5-#
Ruling
6
Stricken in part. Only the portion of the slide re DVFS may remain in.
9
Figure stricken. Not supported by paragraphs of expert report
18
19
referenced or citations therein
10
20
21
referenced or citations therein.
11& 12
22
Stricken. As stated on the record, Freescale cannot use this slide. Court
must be able to consider all the underlying documents it purports to
23
24
Both figures stricken. Not supported by paragraphs of expert report
summarize.
Allowed.
14
Allowed.
15
Withdrawn.
16
25
13
Stricken. This summary slide needs to be revised to conform to the
26
27
28
Court’s rulings.
1
27
Withdrawn.
2
33
Stricken.
3
36
Revise “servant” per the Court’s instruction on the record.
4
37, 38
Revise “servant” per the Court’s instruction on the record; Reserve on
5
6
the remainder in light of ruling on Slides 39 and 41.
39 and 41
7
Stricken. Not supported by paragraphs of expert report referenced or
citations therein.
8
40
No objection.
9
43 and 47
Freescale has withdrawn animation on the right-hand side, as stated on
10
the record.
Northern District of California
44, 45, 46
Headings to be changed, as stated on the record.
12
United States District Court
11
52, 53, 54, 55, 57,
Stricken without prejudice to Freescale revising to comport with
13
58, 59
citations from experts’ reports.
14
56
Stricken without prejudice to Freescale describing purpose of the slide.
15
62-66
Stricken.
16
67, 68
Reserved.
69, 70
Stricken. Summary slide to be revised based upon Court's rulings.
17
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 10, 2014
20
21
_______________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?