Wilson v. City of Oakland et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 2/6/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/30/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C-11-05377 DMR
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CITY OF OAKLAND,
Defendants City of Oakland and County of Alameda have each file a motion to dismiss.
[Docket Nos. 16-17.] Currently, the motions are set for a court hearing on February 23, 2012.
Plaintiff Nicole Wilson is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local
Court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendants’ motions by January
25, 2012. See N.D. Cal. L.R. 7-3. The court has received no such opposition.
The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by February 6, 2012 and explain her failure to
respond to the motions. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit her opposition(s) to
the court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motions. This order to show cause does not
indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff’s late submissions. If Plaintiff does not
respond by February 6, 2012, Defendants’ motions may be granted.
The court further ORDERS that Defendants shall file replies, if any, to their respective
motions no later than February 13, 2012.
DONNA M. RYU na M. Ryu
udge Magistrate Judge
Dated: January 30, 2012
IT IS S
IT IS SO ORDERED.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
D IS T IC T O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?