Brown v. FPI Management, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER re 58 Letter filed by FPI Management, Inc.. Signed by Judge GONZALEZ ROGERS on 1/9/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6

ASHANNA BROWN,

7
8
9
10
11

Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No.: C-11-05414-YGR
ORDER REQUIRING WRITTEN RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT FPI MANAGEMENT, INC.’S
SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRE-FILING
CONFERENCE REQUEST

FPI MANAGEMENT, INC. and KENNEDYWILSON, INC.,
Defendants.

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12

On January 2, 2013, Defendant FPI Management, Inc. filed a letter with the Court pursuant to
13

its Standing Order in Civil Cases requesting a pre-summary judgment motion conference. (Dkt. No.
14

58.) To date, Plaintiff has failed to respond despite the Standing Order’s requirement that, within
15

three (3) business days, any adversary wishing to oppose must file a written response addressing the
16

substance of the moving party’s letter. If no response is filed by Plaintiff by Friday, January 11, 2013
17

at 9:00 a.m., the Court will interpret the failure to respond as an admission of good cause for the filing
18

of FPI’s summary judgment motion and will provide leave to so file.
19

The Court reminds the parties that under the Court’s Standing Order, only one summary
20

judgment motion may be filed per side, absent leave of Court. If Defendant Kennedy-Wilson, Inc.
21

wishes to respond to FPI’s letter, it must do so by January 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
22

Depending upon the Court’s review of the response letter(s) filed (if any), the Court may set a
23

date and time for a conference at a future time.
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 9, 2013
____________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE