Brown v. FPI Management, Inc. et al
ORDER re 58 Letter filed by FPI Management, Inc.. Signed by Judge GONZALEZ ROGERS on 1/9/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: C-11-05414-YGR
ORDER REQUIRING WRITTEN RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT FPI MANAGEMENT, INC.’S
SUMMARY JUDGMENT PRE-FILING
FPI MANAGEMENT, INC. and KENNEDYWILSON, INC.,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
On January 2, 2013, Defendant FPI Management, Inc. filed a letter with the Court pursuant to
its Standing Order in Civil Cases requesting a pre-summary judgment motion conference. (Dkt. No.
58.) To date, Plaintiff has failed to respond despite the Standing Order’s requirement that, within
three (3) business days, any adversary wishing to oppose must file a written response addressing the
substance of the moving party’s letter. If no response is filed by Plaintiff by Friday, January 11, 2013
at 9:00 a.m., the Court will interpret the failure to respond as an admission of good cause for the filing
of FPI’s summary judgment motion and will provide leave to so file.
The Court reminds the parties that under the Court’s Standing Order, only one summary
judgment motion may be filed per side, absent leave of Court. If Defendant Kennedy-Wilson, Inc.
wishes to respond to FPI’s letter, it must do so by January 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.
Depending upon the Court’s review of the response letter(s) filed (if any), the Court may set a
date and time for a conference at a future time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 9, 2013
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?