Totaro v. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC.

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (ENE) re 23 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. filed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC., Case referred to early neutral evaluation. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 2/3/12. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY TOTARO
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE
NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC

CASE NO. ______________________
11-cv-05446-PJH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
✔
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
✔
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
1/31/2012

____________________________
s/ Matthew Z. Crotty
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
1/31/2012

____________________________
s/ Jesse L. Miller
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

Dated: 2/3/12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

9X
9

A

H

ER

LI

RT

FO

NO

__________________________________
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
on
. Hamilt
JDISTRICT
UNITED STATESs MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Phylli
Judge

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2