Totaro v. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC.

Filing 54

STIPUALTION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/22/13. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10
11

Stephen Robert Onstot (SBN 139319)
[e-mail]
1601 Barton Rd., #3902
Redlands, CA 92373
Telephone:
[phone]
Thomas G. Jarrard, Pro Hac Vice
[e-mail]
Law Office of Thomas G. Jarrard, PLLC
1020 North Washington Street
Spokane, WA 99203
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Matthew Z. Crotty, Pro Hac Vice
Crotty & Son Law Firm, PLLC
421 West Riverside, Suite 1005
Spokane, WA 99201-0300
Telephone:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ANTHONY TOTARO

12
13
14
15
16

Jesse L. Miller (SBN 183229)
Email: [e-mail]
Jennifer R. Fearnow (SBN 246007)
Email: [e-mail]
REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

17
18

Attorneys for Defendant
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL
SECURITY, LLC

19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
22

ANTHONY TOTARO,
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

No.: C-11-5446-PJH
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

vs.
Compl. Filed:
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL
SECURITY, LLC,

October 31, 2011

Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton

Defendant.

27
28
Case No.: C-11-5446-PJH

–1–

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their

2

designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice

3

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). Each party shall bear its own costs and

4

attorneys’ fees.

5
6

Dated: March 21, 2013

/s/ Thomas G. Jarrard
Thomas G. Jarrard
Attorney for Plaintiff, ANTHONY TOTARO

Dated: March 21, 2013

/s/ Jesse L. Miller
Jesse L. Miller
Attorney for Defendant, LAWRENCE
LIVERMORE NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC

7
8
9

ORDER

12
13

The Court, having considered the Stipulation between the parties, Orders the Complaint in

14

this action dismissed, with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DISTR

ICT
S
TE
_____________________________________
C
TA
Hon. Phyllis J. HamiltonD
United StatesIT IS SO ORDERE
District Judge

RT

Judge P

20

A

H

ER

n
Hamilto
hyllis J.

R NIA

NO

19

FO

18

LI

17

3/22/13
DATED: ________________________

S

16

UNIT
ED

REED SMITH LLP

11

RT
U
O

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: C-11-5446-PJH

–2–

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER