Calderon v. Davey Tree Surgery Company

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER Discovery due by 2/15/2013. Motions due by 4/26/2013.. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 12/10/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RICHARD H. HARDING, Bar No. 053698 MICHAEL E. BREWER, Bar No. 177912 ALEXA L. WOERNER, Bar No. 267609 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. A Professional Corporation Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Telephone: 925.932.2468 Fax No.: 925.946.9809 Attorneys for Defendant DAVEY TREE SURGERY COMPANY 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT 11 12 FELIPE CALDERON, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 4:11-CV-05486-SBA STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND RELATED DEADLINES DAVEY TREE SURGERY COMPANY, and DOES 1-50, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff FELIPE CALDERON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant DAVEY TREE 19 SURGERY COMPANY (“Defendant”) (collectively “The Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree to 20 the following: 21 WHEREAS, on November 6, 2012, the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong, 22 pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, ordered the Parties: to complete all discovery, with the exception 23 of expert discovery, by January 4, 2013; to designate expert witnesses by January 4, 2013; to 24 disclose rebuttal witnesses by February 1, 2013; and to complete all discovery pertaining to expert 25 witnesses by March 8, 2013 (Court Docket No. 21); 26 WHEREAS, on November 6, 2012, the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong, 27 pursuant to the Parties’ stipulation, ordered that all motions, including dispositive motions shall be 28 heard on or before March 12, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. (Court Docket No. 21); LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 925.932.2468 CASE NO.: 4:11-cv-05486-SBA STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 WHEREAS, the Parties have exchanged written discovery requests and have 2 otherwise engaged in mutual discovery. Each party intends to take one or more depositions in this 3 case and Plaintiff’s deposition is currently noticed for December 28, 2012; 4 WHEREAS, the Parties are still attempting to resolve this matter before incurring the 5 significant costs and expenses associated with the completion of depositions, written discovery, and 6 discovery motions, with preparing for trial and before incurring the potential disruption to the 7 business of Defendant; 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s responses to Defendant’s written discovery requests are 9 overdue and Defendant intends to file a motion to compel responses if the matter cannot be resolved 10 through a further meet and confer process. The Parties wish to have additional time to resolve 11 discovery disputes prior to court intervention. 12 WHEREAS, the Parties the parties believe it would preserve the Parties’ and the 13 Court’s resources were the Parties able to further explore a negotiated resolution to this case prior to 14 engaging in further discovery and discovery motions; 15 WHEREAS, the Parties and their counsel respectfully request that: the January 4, 16 2013 non-expert discovery deadline be continued until February 15, 2013, so that the Parties may 17 explore the informal resolution of this matter prior to completing all anticipated discovery; the 18 deadline to designate expert witnesses be continued from January 4, 2013 to February 15, 2013; the 19 deadline to disclose rebuttal witnesses be continued from February 1, 2013 to March 15, 2013; the 20 deadline to complete all discovery pertaining to expert witnesses be continued from March 8, 2013 21 to March 29, 2013 ; and the deadline hear motions be continued from March 12, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. to 22 April 26, 2013; and 23 WHEREAS, on October 18, 2012, by stipulation, the Parties previously requested an 24 extension of deadlines in this case. Further extension of dates will not affect the May 13, 2013 trial 25 date currently scheduled in this case; 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 925.932.2468 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective counsel, that: 1. The non-expert discovery cut-off be continued from January 4, 2013 to 2. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 February 15, 2013; 2. The deadline the deadline to designate expert witnesses be continued from January 4, 2013 to February 15, 2013; 3. The deadline to disclose rebuttal witnesses be continued from February 1, 2013 to March 15, 2013; 4. The deadline to complete all discovery pertaining to expert witnesses be continued from March 8, 2013 to March 29, 2012; and 5. The deadline to hear motions be continued from March 12, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. to April 26, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. IT IS SO STIPULATED 11 12 Dated: December 7, 2012 _/S/ Michael E. Brewer_____________ RICHARD H. HARDING MICHAEL E. BREWER LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant DAVEY TREE SURGERY COMPANY 13 14 15 16 Dated: December 7, 2012 17 18 /S/ Michael J. Reed MICHAEL J. REED Attorney for Plaintiff FELIPE CALDERON 19 ______ 20 21 As good cause exists due to Parties’ attempts to resolve this matter before incurring the 22 significant costs and expense associated with the completion of additional discovery, discovery 23 motions, and trial preparation and before incurring the disruption to the business of Defendant, the 24 Court hereby modifies its Order filed in this matter on November 6, 2012, as stipulated above. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: December 10, 2012 By: 27 Honorable Sandra Brown Armstrong UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Firmwide:116718912.3 001365.1154 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 925.932.2468 3. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND RELATED DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?