Calderon v. Davey Tree Surgery Company
Filing
55
ORDER, Motions terminated: 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Pre-Trial and Trial Dates filed by Felipe Calderon, Davey Tree Surgery Company, 51 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Pre-Trial and Trial Dates filed by Felipe Calderon, Davey Tree Surgery Company, 47 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Felipe Calderon., ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 3/11/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
OAKLAND DIVISION
5
6 FELIPE CALDERON,
Plaintiff,
7
8
vs.
Case No: C 11-5486 SBA
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT
OF COUNSEL
9 DAVEY TREE SURGERY COMPANY,
10
Defendant.
11
12
13
Plaintiff has submitted a pro se request for the Court to appoint counsel to represent
14
him in this action. Dkt. 92 at 2-3. “[I]t is well-established that there is generally no
15
constitutional right to counsel in civil cases.” United States v. Sardone, 94 F.3d 1233, 1236
16
(9th Cir. 1996). Nonetheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), the Court has the discretion to
17
appoint counsel to “any person unable to afford counsel.” The discretionary appointment
18
of counsel typically is reserved for cases involving “exceptional circumstances.” Terrell v.
19
Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991). “A finding of exceptional circumstances
20
requires an evaluation of both ‘the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the
21
petitioner to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues
22
involved.’ Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before
23
reaching a decision.” Id.
24
Here, Plaintiff is unable to communicate in English, which necessarily impedes his
25
ability to articulate his claims to either the Court or a jury. Although Plaintiff’s motion
26
does not specifically address his likelihood of success, the Court notes that the law and
27
motion cut-off lapsed without Defendant filing any dispositive motion in this case. Dkt. 17.
28
Given that fact, it is reasonable to infer that there are triable issues of material fact that must
1
be resolved by a trier of fact. Moreover, the Federal Pro Bono Project, has indicated that it
2
is likely that it will be able to find a volunteer attorney to represent Plaintiff in this action.
3
Accordingly,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
5
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel is GRANTED.
6
2.
This matter is REFERRED to the Federal Pro Bono Project for the purposes
7
8
9
10
of securing legal representation for Plaintiff in this action, for all purposes.
3.
The instant action is temporarily STAYED while the Federal Pro Bono
Project locates volunteer counsel for Plaintiff.
4.
The deadlines for filing motions in limine and other pretrial documents, the
11
settlement conference set for March 25, 2013, the pretrial conference date of May 7, 2013,
12
and the trial date of May 13, 2013 are VACATED. These dates shall be rescheduled at a
13
further Case Management Conference which will be scheduled after the appointment of pro
14
bono counsel.
15
5.
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
This Order terminates Docket 47, 51 and 54.
Dated: March 11, 2013
______________________________
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
FELIPE CALDERON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
7
8
v.
DAVEY TREE SURGERY COMPANY et al,
Defendant.
/
9
10
Case Number: CV11-05486 SBA
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
12
13
14
15
16
17
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on March 11, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Felipe Calderon
4322 Center Avenue
Richmond, CA 94804
Dated: March 11, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
25
By: Lisa Clark, Deputy Clerk
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?