Blinky, Inc v. EMT Lighting, Inc et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. Each party to bear its own fees and costs. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/9/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012) Modified on 8/10/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page1 of 4
1
2
Anne Hiaring Hocking, Cal. Bar No. 88639
anne@hiaringsmith.com
Vijay K. Toke, Cal. Bar No. 215079
vijay@hiaringsmith.com
3
6
HIARING + SMITH, LLP
101 Lucas Valley Road, Suite 300
San Rafael, CA 94903
Telephone: (415) 457-2040
Facsimile: (415) 457-2822
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
BLINKY INC.
4
5
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
)
)
Plaintiff, )
)
)
vs.
)
)
EMT LIGHTING, INC., a California
Corporation, EMT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a )
Nevada Corporation, EMT TECHNOLOGIES, )
)
a sole proprietorship, GEORGE DANIEL
)
WALLER, an individual, ROBERT
HENDERSON, an individual, and DOES 1 – )
)
100,
)
Defendants. )
)
)
BLINKY INC., a California Corporation,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No.: CV-11-05487 SBA
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)];
ORDER
Action Filed 11/10/2011
20
21
////
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
CV-11-05487 SBA: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page2 of 4
1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY
3
STIPULATED by and between BLINKY, INC. (”Plaintiff” and “Counterdefendant”) and GEORGE
4
DANIEL WALLER and SHERRY J. WALLER, as Husband & Wife dba ENERGY
5
MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES (“Defendants” and “Counterclaimants”), by and through their
6
respective counsel of record herein, that the entirety of the above-captioned action, including
7
Plaintiff’s Complaint as to all named defendants, and all claims therein, Counterclaimant’s
8
Counterclaims, and all claims therein, shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and all claims
9
against DOE defendants shall be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
10
11
The parties further stipulate and request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms
of the Settlement Agreement in this action.
12
The parties stipulate that each party is to bear its own fees and costs.
13
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
14
DATED: August 7, 2012
HIARING + SMITH LLP
15
16
By: _/s/ Vijay K. Toke____
Vijay K. Toke
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
BLINKY, INC.
17
18
19
20
DATED: August 7, 2012
NEWHOUSE & ASSOCIATES
21
By: __/David E. Newhouse/__
David E. Newhouse
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimant
GEORGE DANIEL WALLER and
SHERRY J. WALLER,
as Husband & Wife dba
ENERGY MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES
22
23
24
25
///
26
27
28
2
CV-11-05487 SBA: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page3 of 4
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
6
Dated: 8/9/12
_
The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
CV-11-05487 SBA: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]
Case4:11-cv-05487-SBA Document33 Filed08/07/12 Page4 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF MARIN
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I am employed in the County of Marin, State of California; my business address is 101
Lucas Valley Road, Suite 300, San Rafael, California 94903; I am over the age of 18 and not a
party to the within action. On August 7, 2012, I served the following document(s):
1.
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)];ORDER
on the parties shown below:
David E. Newhouse, Esq.
Newhouse & Associates
Twin Oaks Office Plaza, Suite 112
477 Ninth Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94402
Attorney for Defendants &
Counterclaimants:
George Daniel Waller
Sherry J. Waller
Husband and Wife dba
Energy Management Technologies
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
__X__ (BY MAIL) I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice for the processing of
mail; on this date, the above-referenced documents were placed for collection
and delivery by the U.S. Postal Service following ordinary business practices.
17
18
__X__ Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
court at whose direction the service was made.
19
20
21
Executed this 7th day of August 2012 at San Rafael, California.
22
/s/ Gerie Johnson
Gerie Johnson
23
24
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case No. CV-11-05487 SBA
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?