Williams v. Martel
Filing
64
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge ARMSTRONG on 5/9/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
DANIELLE F. O'BANNON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
SAHAR NAYERI
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 275246
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-5337
Facsimile: (415) 703-1234
Attorneys for Defendants T. Boerum, M. Martel, J. Robertson,
B. Haub, W. Rodriguez, P. Farnsworth, C. MacDonald, R.
Briggs, J. Puu, E. Garcia, and D. Stokley
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND
12
13
Case No. C 11-5558 SBA (PR)
JOSEPH WILLIAMS,
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
14
15
v.
16
17
M. MARTEL, et al.,
Defendants.
18
19
Plaintiff Joseph Williams and Defendants M. Martel, et al. have resolved this case in its
20
entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal
21
Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
26
27
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (C 11-5558 SBA (PR))
1
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
2
It is so stipulated.
3
4
Dated:
5/07/13
/s/ Joseph Williams
Plaintiff
Dated:
5/08/13
/s/ Sahar Nayeri
Sahar Nayeri
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General's Office
Attorney for Defendants M. MARTEL, et al.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The
Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
15
Dated:
5/9/13
The Honorable Saundra B. Armstrong
16
17
18
19
20
21
SF2012204901
22
20686464.doc
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (C 11-5558 SBA (PR))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?