Garner v. Yates

Filing 3

ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/30/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ARTHUR GRADY GARNER, 4 Petitioner, 5 6 No. C 11-05566 CW (PR) ORDER OF TRANSFER v. YATES, Warden, 7 Respondent. 8 9 / Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se petition for United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging 11 as a violation of his constitutional rights the denial of parole by 12 the California Board of Parole Hearings. 13 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 14 Petitioner has filed an A petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a state 15 prisoner in a State that contains two or more federal judicial 16 districts may be filed in either the district of confinement or the 17 district of conviction. 18 court where the petition is filed, however, may transfer the 19 petition to the other district in the furtherance of justice. 20 id. 21 petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of 22 conviction. 23 Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968). 24 But if a habeas petition is directed to the manner in which a 25 sentence is being executed, e.g., if it involves parole or time 26 credit claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum. 27 See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th 28 Cir. 1989). See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). The district See Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear See Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D. 1 Petitioner is incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison, in 2 Fresno County, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District 3 of California. 4 challenges the execution of his sentence, the Court hereby ORDERS 5 that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and 6 in the interests of justice, this petition be TRANSFERRED to the 7 United States District Court for the Eastern District of 8 California. 9 See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b). Because Petitioner IT IS SO ORDERED. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Dated: 11/30/2011 11 CLAUDIA WILKEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 ARTHUR GARNER, Case Number: CV11-05566 CW 4 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 5 v. 6 YATES et al, 7 Defendant. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 30, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 13 14 15 16 17 18 Arthur Grady Garner D-26064 Pleasant Valley State prison P.O. Box 8501 Coalinga, CA 93210 Dated: November 30, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?