Garner v. Yates
Filing
3
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 11/30/2011. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
ARTHUR GRADY GARNER,
4
Petitioner,
5
6
No. C 11-05566 CW (PR)
ORDER OF TRANSFER
v.
YATES, Warden,
7
Respondent.
8
9
/
Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed a pro se petition for
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging
11
as a violation of his constitutional rights the denial of parole by
12
the California Board of Parole Hearings.
13
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
14
Petitioner has filed an
A petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by a state
15
prisoner in a State that contains two or more federal judicial
16
districts may be filed in either the district of confinement or the
17
district of conviction.
18
court where the petition is filed, however, may transfer the
19
petition to the other district in the furtherance of justice.
20
id.
21
petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of
22
conviction.
23
Cal. 1993); Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968).
24
But if a habeas petition is directed to the manner in which a
25
sentence is being executed, e.g., if it involves parole or time
26
credit claims, the district of confinement is the preferable forum.
27
See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th
28
Cir. 1989).
See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).
The district
See
Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear
See Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 767 (N.D.
1
Petitioner is incarcerated at Pleasant Valley State Prison, in
2
Fresno County, which lies within the venue of the Eastern District
3
of California.
4
challenges the execution of his sentence, the Court hereby ORDERS
5
that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b), and
6
in the interests of justice, this petition be TRANSFERRED to the
7
United States District Court for the Eastern District of
8
California.
9
See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b).
Because Petitioner
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Dated:
11/30/2011
11
CLAUDIA WILKEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
ARTHUR GARNER,
Case Number: CV11-05566 CW
4
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
5
v.
6
YATES et al,
7
Defendant.
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on November 30, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Arthur Grady Garner D-26064
Pleasant Valley State prison
P.O. Box 8501
Coalinga, CA 93210
Dated: November 30, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Nikki Riley, Deputy Clerk
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?