Garth v. United States et al

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File to 3/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

JUDY GARTH,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

vs.

Case No.: 11-cv-05592-YGR
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT. NOS. 27 &
28)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.

Northern District of California

United States District Court

12
13
14
15

On January 23, 2013, the Court dismissed this action based on a lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 22.) Judgment has been entered (Dkt. No. 23) and the case has been closed.
On February 26, 2013, the Court issued an order permitting Plaintiff to file documents that she

16

asserts were not in her possession and had been filed in this action but not reflected in the record.

17

(Dkt. No. 26.) The Court gave Plaintiff until March 8, 2013 to file.

18
19
20

Plaintiff has since filed two motions for extensions of time claiming that she still does not
have the documents in her possession based on “unforeseen circumstances.” (Dkt. Nos. 27 & 28.)
As stated in the Court’s February 26,2013, the Court takes no position on whether Plaintiff’s

21

motions are proper. However, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for an extension to file the

22

documents. Plaintiff shall file the documents by March 18, 2013.

23

This Order terminates Dkt. No. 28.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: March 18, 2013

___________________________________
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE