Garth v. United States et al

Filing 29

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 28 Motion for Extension of Time to File to 3/18/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 JUDY GARTH, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 vs. Case No.: 11-cv-05592-YGR ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT. NOS. 27 & 28) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Northern District of California United States District Court 12 13 14 15 On January 23, 2013, the Court dismissed this action based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 22.) Judgment has been entered (Dkt. No. 23) and the case has been closed. On February 26, 2013, the Court issued an order permitting Plaintiff to file documents that she 16 asserts were not in her possession and had been filed in this action but not reflected in the record. 17 (Dkt. No. 26.) The Court gave Plaintiff until March 8, 2013 to file. 18 19 20 Plaintiff has since filed two motions for extensions of time claiming that she still does not have the documents in her possession based on “unforeseen circumstances.” (Dkt. Nos. 27 & 28.) As stated in the Court’s February 26,2013, the Court takes no position on whether Plaintiff’s 21 motions are proper. However, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for an extension to file the 22 documents. Plaintiff shall file the documents by March 18, 2013. 23 This Order terminates Dkt. No. 28. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 18, 2013 ___________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?