Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al

Filing 167

ORDER Regarding Plaintiffs' Failure to Repsond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/9/2013. (oh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 YVETTE FELARCA, et al., 7 8 9 10 Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 11-CV-5719 YGR ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, et al., Defendants. 11 Northern District of California United States District Court 12 Defendants George Hallett, Eric Tejada, and Marc DeCoulode each have filed an individual 13 motion to dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 161 (Hallett Mot.), 162 (Tejada Mot.), 164 (DeCoulode Mot.). The 14 motions were filed, respectively, on July 11, July 15, and July 15, 2013. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 15 7-3, Plaintiffs were required to file and serve either an opposition brief or a notice of nonopposition 16 “not more than 14 days after the motion[s] [were] filed.” Civ. L.R. 7-3(a); see also Civ. L.R. 7-3(b). 17 As such, responses were due July 25, July 27, and July 27, respectively. Though Plaintiffs’ responses 18 were due two weeks ago, Plaintiffs to date have failed to respond to all three motions. 19 Plaintiffs shall respond to the Motions to Dismiss no later than five (5) calendar days from 20 the signature date of this Order. Failure to respond by that date will result in dismissal of these 21 Defendants for failure to prosecute. Any reply to an opposition must be served and filed not more 22 than seven (7) days after the opposition is served and filed. Civ. L.R. 7-3(c). 23 The motions’ hearing date of September 3, 2013, remains undisturbed. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 9, 2013 _________________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?