Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al

Filing 249

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 9/26/14 Settlement Conference;denying without prejudice 233 , 236 , 237 , 248 Motions for Administrative Relief to Excuse Personal Attendance at 9/26/14 Settlement Conference. The parties may submit a new motion for administrative relief on or before 9/17/2014 in accordance with this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 YVETTE FELARCA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 11-cv-05719-YGR (KAW) ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, et al., Defendants. ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS AND PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT 9/26/14 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Defendants have filed a number of administrative motions for relief to be excused from 14 personal attendance at the September 26, 2014 settlement conference. (See Dkt. Nos. 233, 236, 15 237, 248.) 16 I. PERSONAL ATTENDANCE 17 As an initial matter, all individuals who have authority to settle this lawsuit must be 18 present. Given the large number of plaintiffs and defendants in this case, and the piecemeal nature 19 in which the motions for administrative relief were filed, all pending requests to be excused are 20 DENIED without prejudice. 21 22 23 In light of the number of parties involved in this litigation, and the improbability of identifying a date where all parties are available, the Court orders as follows: 1. Generally, all parties, including law enforcement personnel, who were directly 24 involved in the incident(s) will be required to personally appear. If personal attendance is not 25 possible, the individual seeking relief may submit a new request to be excused from personal 26 attendance. Lead counsel for the plaintiffs and lead counsel for each set of defendants shall file 27 one administrative motion for relief to excuse personal attendance on behalf of all of his/her 28 clients requiring such relief on or before September 17, 2014. Each motion shall clearly identify 1 all represented individuals requesting relief from personal attendance and those who will be 2 attending the settlement conference. It shall also contain the factual allegations pertaining to each 3 individual party seeking to be excused from personally attending, including citations to the third 4 amended complaint, and the reason why the individual cannot attend. Declarations from each 5 individual party seeking relief must be attached as a tabbed exhibit to their counsel’s respective 6 motion for administrative relief and contain the following: 7 a. The factual basis of the party’s alleged involvement in this case. 8 b. Why the party cannot attend. 9 c. Identify the individual or attorney who has full authority to settle the action on his/her behalf. 10 d. Explicitly state that the party understands that he/she will not be consulted United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 during the settlement conference, via telephone or otherwise, and waives the 13 right to approve any settlement that may be agreed to on his/her behalf. Any 14 party who does not wish to delegate full settlement authority to a representative 15 who will be present at the settlement conference, must attend the settlement 16 conference personally. 17 e. Signature: The declaration may contain an electronic signature for the purposes 18 of filing, but a declaration with an original signature must be provided to the 19 Court prior to the settlement conference as described below. 20 2. Each administrative motion shall be accompanied by a proposed order that lists all 21 individuals requesting relief in a check box format, so that the Court may excuse the attendance of 22 some or all of the parties. The proposed order must clearly state that relief is conditioned upon the 23 receipt of an original signature on or before September 25, 2014. 24 3. The parties shall furnish chambers copies of the declarations to the Court, with an 25 original signature (photocopy/fax transmission is acceptable so long as counsel certifies that 26 he/she has a copy of the original signature or that it is in transit; electronic signature is not 27 acceptable), at least one day prior to the settlement conference. If the hard copies of the 28 declarations (electronic filing is insufficient) are not received by the Clerk’s office by 12:00 p.m. 2 1 on September 25, 2014, the order granting the request will be rescinded and personal attendance 2 will be required. 3 4. Defendants shall contact Courtroom Deputy Susan Imbriani at (510) 637-3525 no 4 later than September 19, 2014 at 12:00 p.m. to advise whether each set of defendants, 5 represented by the three respective law firms, require separate rooms for the settlement 6 conference. 5. 7 On or before September 24, 2014 at 12:00 p.m., all parties shall advise Ms. 8 Imbriani as to how many people (attorneys, parties, and representatives of government agencies 9 and/or insurance careers, if applicable) will be in attendance at the settlement conference. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 II. SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS Plaintiffs may collectively lodge one settlement conference statement and one optional, confidential letter. They need not lodge 22 individual letters. Each set of defendants, represented by the three respective law firms, shall lodge one settlement conference statement and one optional, confidential letter. Given the large number of individuals involved in this litigation, the parties are encouraged 16 to clearly identify all remaining parties and their alleged involvement in this litigation in their 17 respective statements. Accordingly, the length of the parties’ settlement conference statements 18 shall not exceed 15, rather than 10, pages. 19 Lastly, the parties are reminded that their settlement conference statements must be lodged 20 (do not file) on September 19, 2014. Chambers copies must be received by 4:00 p.m., and copies 21 must also be emailed in accordance with the Court’s Settlement Conference Standing Order 22 (available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders). 23 24 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2014 ______________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?