Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al
Filing
249
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 9/26/14 Settlement Conference;denying without prejudice 233 , 236 , 237 , 248 Motions for Administrative Relief to Excuse Personal Attendance at 9/26/14 Settlement Conference. The parties may submit a new motion for administrative relief on or before 9/17/2014 in accordance with this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
YVETTE FELARCA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 11-cv-05719-YGR (KAW)
ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE STATEMENTS AND
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE AT 9/26/14
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Defendants have filed a number of administrative motions for relief to be excused from
14
personal attendance at the September 26, 2014 settlement conference. (See Dkt. Nos. 233, 236,
15
237, 248.)
16
I.
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE
17
As an initial matter, all individuals who have authority to settle this lawsuit must be
18
present. Given the large number of plaintiffs and defendants in this case, and the piecemeal nature
19
in which the motions for administrative relief were filed, all pending requests to be excused are
20
DENIED without prejudice.
21
22
23
In light of the number of parties involved in this litigation, and the improbability of
identifying a date where all parties are available, the Court orders as follows:
1.
Generally, all parties, including law enforcement personnel, who were directly
24
involved in the incident(s) will be required to personally appear. If personal attendance is not
25
possible, the individual seeking relief may submit a new request to be excused from personal
26
attendance. Lead counsel for the plaintiffs and lead counsel for each set of defendants shall file
27
one administrative motion for relief to excuse personal attendance on behalf of all of his/her
28
clients requiring such relief on or before September 17, 2014. Each motion shall clearly identify
1
all represented individuals requesting relief from personal attendance and those who will be
2
attending the settlement conference. It shall also contain the factual allegations pertaining to each
3
individual party seeking to be excused from personally attending, including citations to the third
4
amended complaint, and the reason why the individual cannot attend. Declarations from each
5
individual party seeking relief must be attached as a tabbed exhibit to their counsel’s respective
6
motion for administrative relief and contain the following:
7
a. The factual basis of the party’s alleged involvement in this case.
8
b. Why the party cannot attend.
9
c. Identify the individual or attorney who has full authority to settle the action on
his/her behalf.
10
d. Explicitly state that the party understands that he/she will not be consulted
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
during the settlement conference, via telephone or otherwise, and waives the
13
right to approve any settlement that may be agreed to on his/her behalf. Any
14
party who does not wish to delegate full settlement authority to a representative
15
who will be present at the settlement conference, must attend the settlement
16
conference personally.
17
e. Signature: The declaration may contain an electronic signature for the purposes
18
of filing, but a declaration with an original signature must be provided to the
19
Court prior to the settlement conference as described below.
20
2.
Each administrative motion shall be accompanied by a proposed order that lists all
21
individuals requesting relief in a check box format, so that the Court may excuse the attendance of
22
some or all of the parties. The proposed order must clearly state that relief is conditioned upon the
23
receipt of an original signature on or before September 25, 2014.
24
3.
The parties shall furnish chambers copies of the declarations to the Court, with an
25
original signature (photocopy/fax transmission is acceptable so long as counsel certifies that
26
he/she has a copy of the original signature or that it is in transit; electronic signature is not
27
acceptable), at least one day prior to the settlement conference. If the hard copies of the
28
declarations (electronic filing is insufficient) are not received by the Clerk’s office by 12:00 p.m.
2
1
on September 25, 2014, the order granting the request will be rescinded and personal attendance
2
will be required.
3
4.
Defendants shall contact Courtroom Deputy Susan Imbriani at (510) 637-3525 no
4
later than September 19, 2014 at 12:00 p.m. to advise whether each set of defendants,
5
represented by the three respective law firms, require separate rooms for the settlement
6
conference.
5.
7
On or before September 24, 2014 at 12:00 p.m., all parties shall advise Ms.
8
Imbriani as to how many people (attorneys, parties, and representatives of government agencies
9
and/or insurance careers, if applicable) will be in attendance at the settlement conference.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
II.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENTS
Plaintiffs may collectively lodge one settlement conference statement and one optional,
confidential letter. They need not lodge 22 individual letters.
Each set of defendants, represented by the three respective law firms, shall lodge one
settlement conference statement and one optional, confidential letter.
Given the large number of individuals involved in this litigation, the parties are encouraged
16
to clearly identify all remaining parties and their alleged involvement in this litigation in their
17
respective statements. Accordingly, the length of the parties’ settlement conference statements
18
shall not exceed 15, rather than 10, pages.
19
Lastly, the parties are reminded that their settlement conference statements must be lodged
20
(do not file) on September 19, 2014. Chambers copies must be received by 4:00 p.m., and copies
21
must also be emailed in accordance with the Court’s Settlement Conference Standing Order
22
(available at http://cand.uscourts.gov/kaworders).
23
24
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 11, 2014
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?