Felarca et al v. Birgeneau et al
Filing
367
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding personal attendance at the 2/27/2015 Further Settlement Conference. The parties may submit motions for administrative relief on or before 2/25/2014 in accordance with this order. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/23/2015. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
YVETTE FELARCA, et al.,
Case No. 11-cv-05719-YGR (KAW)
Plaintiffs,
8
ORDER REGARDING PERSONAL
ATTENDANCE AT THE 2/27/2015
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
9
10
ROBERT J. BIRGENEAU, et al.,
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
All individuals who have authority to settle this lawsuit must be present. Since this is a
14
further settlement conference, however, the Court will excuse the parties from personal attendance
15
upon request, as follows:
16
1.
Lead counsel for the plaintiffs and lead counsel for each set of defendants shall file
17
one administrative motion for relief to excuse personal attendance on behalf of all of his/her
18
clients requiring such relief on or before February 25, 2015. Each motion shall clearly identify
19
all represented individuals requesting relief from personal attendance and those who will be
20
attending the settlement conference.
21
2.
New Declarations: Declarations from each individual party seeking relief must be
22
attached as a tabbed exhibit to their counsel’s respective motion for administrative relief and
23
contain the following:
24
25
26
a. Identify the individual or attorney who has full authority to settle the action on
his/her behalf.
b. Explicitly state that the party understands that he/she will not be consulted
27
during the February 27, 2015 settlement conference, via telephone or otherwise,
28
and waives the right to approve any settlement that may be agreed to on his/her
1
behalf. Any party who does not wish to delegate full settlement authority to a
2
representative who will be present at the settlement conference, must attend the
3
settlement conference personally.
4
c. Signature: The declaration may contain an electronic signature for the purposes
5
of filing, but a declaration with an original signature must be provided to the
6
Court upon check-in at the settlement conference.
7
3.
Proposed Order: Each administrative motion shall be accompanied by a proposed
8
order that lists all individuals requesting relief in a check box format, so that the Court may excuse
9
the attendance of some or all of the parties.
10
4.
Chambers Copies: The parties shall furnish chambers copies of the declarations to
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
the Court, with an original signature (photocopy/fax transmission is acceptable so long as counsel
12
certifies that he/she has a copy of the original signature or that it is in transit; electronic signature
13
is not acceptable) on or before February 26, 2015 at 12:00 p.m. If the hard copies of the
14
declarations (electronic filing is insufficient) are not timely received by the Clerk’s office, the
15
order granting the request will be rescinded and personal attendance will be required.
16
5.
All Parties: On or before February 26, 2015 at 12:00 p.m., all parties shall advise
17
Ms. Imbriani as to how many people (attorneys, parties, and representatives of government
18
agencies and/or insurance careers, if applicable) will be in attendance at the settlement conference.
19
6.
Defendants shall contact Courtroom Deputy Susan Imbriani at (510) 637-3525 no
20
later than February 26, 2015 at 12:00 p.m. to advise whether each set of defendants, represented
21
by the three respective law firms, require separate rooms for the settlement conference.
22
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 23, 2015
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?